Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/tianhua1993
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
(0/2/0); Scheduled to end 00:00, 16 May 2009 (UTC) Closed 8 May 2009; candidate withdrew. Frank | talk 03:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: Create new pages for new articles, and thus expand Wikipedia to make it a even larger and accurate encyclopaedia. Make Wikipedia a better source for information by sorting information out nicely and systematically. Actively block out users that spam the pages.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: Ngee Ann Secondary School, and Singapore articles. I want to let other people know correct facts about my school and my country, and not be bluffed by misleading information.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: No. If I would meet with these conflicts, I would look through all the possibilities of the problem, and try to solve it. No matter what happens, I believe that maintaining good relationship with other users, not using force and vulgarities, are important.
General comments
[edit]- Links for tianhua1993: Tianhua1993 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for tianhua1993 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/tianhua1993 before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]Support
[edit]Oppose
[edit]- WP:NOTNOW - With under 150 edits in two years, we don't have any way to judge how you'd behave as an admin. Your contributions are welcome; please keep it up and come back to RfA at a later date. Frank | talk 12:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose- not enough edits, absolutely zero use of the edit summary, even on RfA related additions. tedder (talk) 12:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.