Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nassir49
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
nassir49[edit]
Final (1/3/1); Ended 02:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC), Closed per WP:NOTNOW by naerii 02:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
nassir49 (talk · contribs) - I would like ti nominate user "nassir49" for contribution he has made to wikipedia, specialy for subjects of Somalia its people etc Nassir49 (talk) 17:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I Nassir49 accept this nomination —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nassir49 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate[edit]
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A: I would like to take part improving East African articles specialy the Somali people, it seems to me there are nor or very few administrators of east african origins specaily my area of intrest out there, and i intend to help wikipedia in this area
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: i Have started a number of articles about 5 in number eg. the Sheekhaal people and its subclans, their locations, i have also edited and added extra info on other somali articles, becouse i am passionate about wikipedia i would like to help and contribute to wikipedia on these areas
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I have edited and change in the past the somali clan page number of times to correct and issue, i was told not change it and since then i have stopped it, i never had any conflict with other users
General comments[edit]
- See nassir49's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
- Links for nassir49: Nassir49 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/nassir49 before commenting.
Discussion[edit]
- This wasn't transcluded by the candidate and I can't see him requesting that anyone else transclude it. Can anyone clarify what is going on here? – iridescent 01:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess we'd have to talk with User:CambridgeBayWeather to find out. It doesn't appear this RFA was ready for transclusion. Useight (talk) 01:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It actually looks like the user intended it to be; the user just appears not to know that the RFA pages need to be transcluded. - Icewedge (talk) 01:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just found it. I saw that there were two support votes, the candidate had acceptecd the nomination and answered the questions. Taking that into consideration I assumed that nassir49 had forgotten to finish the process. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I went ahead and removed the template from the neutral section, User:Maxman doesn't appear to have ever wanted to nominate the candidate for adminship. Useight (talk) 02:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And I forgot Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Nassir49. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 02:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I went ahead and removed the template from the neutral section, User:Maxman doesn't appear to have ever wanted to nominate the candidate for adminship. Useight (talk) 02:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just found it. I saw that there were two support votes, the candidate had acceptecd the nomination and answered the questions. Taking that into consideration I assumed that nassir49 had forgotten to finish the process. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It actually looks like the user intended it to be; the user just appears not to know that the RFA pages need to be transcluded. - Icewedge (talk) 01:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess we'd have to talk with User:CambridgeBayWeather to find out. It doesn't appear this RFA was ready for transclusion. Useight (talk) 01:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support[edit]
- Support: we need this fella, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themadmullah (talk • contribs) 08:10, 9 August 2008
Oppose[edit]
- Oppose- you've had less than 50 edits all year, which makes it extremely difficult for me to judge whether you'd use the tools responsibly. Besides, for the work you're doing and intend to do, I don't think you even need the mop & bucket. Reyk YO! 01:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose WP:NOTNOW, also creating sock puppets to support your own RFA is not the best idea. - Icewedge (talk) 01:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per... Just Oppose, it should be obvious. I also recommend a sock report after this. Ironholds 01:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral[edit]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.