Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TehKewl1

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

TehKewl1

Final (0/5/1) ended 08:13, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

TehKewl1 (talk · contribs) – I have been around for a few months, and now I believe I am ready to be an administrator TehKewl1 08:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: ~~I accept this invitation from myself completely.~~ I withdraw my nomination due to peer pressure. TehKewl1 08:13, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn[1] - GIen 10:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I would help out with getting things working, such as bots, and I would also help cleanup around the place, I also know how to use the mediawiki software with adminship, as I started a wiki once before.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:Oh, I sometimes look at an article and just think, wow, this looks like it was professionally made by a small business, not by a mass of users collaborating to put it together. All the pages with template boxes make me happy.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Oh I've had angry vandals after me, especially back in the days when I was VandalKilla. I would deal with them kindly, and assume good faith untill they make a blatant attack.

Comments

Edit count using interiot's JS tool:

Username	TehKewl1
Total edits	782
Distinct pages edited	661
Average edits/page	1.183
First edit	16:02, 20 May 2006
(main)	460
Talk	3
User	62
User talk	236
Image	2
Image talk	1
Category	1
Wikipedia	15
Wikipedia talk	1
Portal	1

Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 08:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See TehKewl1's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool.

Current tally: (0/3/0)

Support

Oppose

– Ch acor 08:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose- Just the other day, he nominated Randy Shughart for speedy deletion as "NN-bio". The article had been vandalized to little more than a stub, but it shows that he did not take the time to check the page history before nominating, nor did he do any research to see whether Randy Shughart was indeed a non-notable biography (Shughart was, in fact, a Medal of Honor winner, and one of the main participants in the events of the film Blackhawk Down, and is a highly notable figure in modern US military history). Carelessness like this shows me that the user is not ready for more powerful tools. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 08:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Far too few edits & answers don't reveal any requirement for admin tools. They raise questions instead - you had a prior/alternative account? Details? You have VandalProof according to your Talk page but you don't/didn't issue vandal warnings. This is a major omission on the part of any vandal fighter, let alone an admin. I suggest that you withdraw, get an editor review and work on the weakeness that this review will reveal before trying again in three or four months' time or ~3000 edits. (aeropagitica) 08:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too few edits, and I don't think that you are ready for/don't understand what admins do. I think a Bcrat should close this early before it gets piled on. Dinosaur puppy 09:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. A good editor who needs some more experience (in terms of time, number of edits, and participation in the Wikipedia space) before adminship can be seriously considered. Zaxem 10:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Nice guy, but this is too early. Suggest withdrawal. -- Samir धर्म 10:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.