Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Randomjack

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Randomjack

Final: (0/3/0) ended 16:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Randomjack (talk · contribs) – I have experience with editing webpages, and administration, as I run the BMWRDC forum which is located HERE. I also have experience with being ad Admin on various other sites.Randomjack

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept this nomination

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I anticipate that I will be helping out and editing, deleting articles as necessary to ensure Wikipedia remains a clean, website, suitable for all ages.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: My AYH Article, as I enjoyed researching the company I wrote it about.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Only once over a Holmesdale Online article. It was because I didn;t fully understand the rules, but since then, I have re-read the rules properly and got a better understanding how the site works

General comments

---

Discussion

• Can you explain this? Bubba hotep 16:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

1. Number of edits means I have to suggest you withdraw under WP:SNOW •CHILLDOUBT• 16:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
2. (treble edit conflicted) Oppose. Only 12 edits at the time of writing this comment. Your eagerness to help improve Wikipedia is appreciated, but unfortunately I cannot support your RfA you with only having 12 edits. I suggest you withdraw this RfA (as it is doubtful it will gain consensus to pass) and reapply when you have significantly more contributions. Best of luck to you. --Deskana (request backup) 16:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
3. Oppose, I suggest withdrawing this RFA. You had five edits prior to submitting it. Most admin candidates have thousands of edits. After you've been an active contributor for a few months, an RFA might be successful. --BigDT 16:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.