Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RHaworth

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RHaworth[edit]

final (30/1/0) ending 09:36 15 August 2005 (UTC) RHaworth (talk · contribs) - Anyone who has ever done any editing of British geography articles knows Roger’s work. He has been a wikipedian since New Year’s Day, and has made 5600 edits in that time. Many of them are marked as minor, admittedly, but that is because Roger’s work has included many instances of adding maps and such to geography articles. He also has contributed much to Wikspace, as can be seen from the edit counts above. A diligent worker, who has also done a considerable amount of work in spotting copyvios and moving pages to more appropriate names. As such, I feel that the admin tools would be useful to him. He’s also proved more than willing to adapt or amend his work to fit ongoing projects, rather than being bullish about it (a skill I wish I was better at!). I think he’d make a fine admin. -- Grutness...wha? 09:36, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Thank you very much. I accept. RHaworth 10:28:46, 2005-08-08 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support - Knows his way around the USA too!, Has greatly helped me survive possible brutal attacks on Wikipedia. --What a guy! Scottfisher 18:00, 9 August 2005 (EST)
  2. Certainly. - Grutness...wha? 09:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Strong support Stewart Adcock 09:53, 8 August 2005 (UTC)... Subject to candidate's acceptance ;)[reply]
  4. Support now that candidate has accepted. That yellow blob on the map is not far from my mum too. David | Talk 10:31, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support - Knows his way round Britain, and knows his way round Wikipedia too. -- Solipsist 10:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support. Great work. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:44, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support. Why shouldn't I--Exir KamalabadiCriticism is welcomed! 11:11, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
  8. Support Knowledgeable edits. freestylefrappe 18:56, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
  9. Support Checked the Talk page, looks impressive enough for the job. Karmafist 18:57, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support. Assumed he was one. Flowerparty talk 20:56, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support. Thunderbrand 21:20, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
  12. Support Francs2000 | Talk 00:49, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support -- Norvy (talk) 00:55, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Looks like a productive and knowledgeable Wikipedian. --Chris 01:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support, fair contributor and I trust the nominator. --Sn0wflake 01:38, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support. As per Sn0wflake. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:17, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support. Per Grutness, Sn0wflake, and Mel Etitis. Bratschetalk 5 pillars 22:00, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
  18. Merovingian (t) (c) 00:40, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
  19. Support. FeloniousMonk 01:36, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support. El_C 02:17, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support. One of the good ones. - Lucky 6.9 07:06, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Martin (Bluemoose) 19:26, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support--Briangotts (talk) 21:00, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support. Looks to be a great admin. ral315 01:03, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
  25. Support Proto t c 09:28, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support. Good and experienced wikipedian. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 04:15, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support. JuntungWu 06:07, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Supoort. I haven't seen a lot of this editors work, but a quick review of the contribs list shows no reason why adminship for this edior shouldn't be "no big deal." The signatures already in this list confirm this is a great editor we can expect great work from. -- Essjay · Talk 03:38, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
  29. BRIAN0918 • 2005-08-14 16:12
  30. Dunc|☺ 02:02, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 04:14, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

Map sources for Requests for adminship/RHaworth at grid reference NY606063
1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. I take a new pages feed. I mainly seem to spot duplicate posted articles, copyvio's and pseudoscience. With Admin rights I will be able to do a bit more, getting rid of patent nonsense and copyvio's after their quarantine period. But mainly I want Admin rights to be able to unwind ill-judged article moves (usually my own!).
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Union Bridge got featured on Did You Know. List of postal districts in the United Kingdom was created following the Wikipedia:Deletion policy/Postal district discussion which I started. (But people are still creating postal district stubs such as DA18!) But my most important contrib (in my opinion) is not actually on the Wiki servers (yet): the "map sources" link below the map on the right is to my "yellow redirector" which enables GB articles to use grid references as input to Egil's map sources pages.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. Can't think of any (remind me). I am always willing to discuss my edits.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/RHaworth&oldid=1086094509"