Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Peruvianllama

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peruvianllama[edit]

[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Peruvianllama|action=edit}} Vote here] (7/0/0) ending 10:00 December 17, 2005 (UTC)

Peruvianllama (talk · contribs) – User:Peruvianllama has got to be one of the calmest, and most helpful vandal fighters I've ever met. User:Peruvianllama always seems to excercise sound judgement. He has been involved in editing, and typo-correcting countless articles. He's put up with 60-some odd vadalisms to his user page without so much as barely blinking. He has stated that he wishes to postpone this RfA until the new year, but I for one, refuse to wait for another GREAT admin! For those of you with editcountitis, and timecountitis, Peruvianllama has 3789 edits to his credit, at the time of this nom, and started on 26 Mar, 2004. негіднийлють (Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS) 10:00, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all for the kind support, and particularly to User:Vilerage for the nomination, however I have ultimately decided to politely decline the nomination at this time. I feel that legitimate concerns could be raised regarding the length of time over which I have been "seriously" editing, since the majority of my edits have been made since mid-September of 2005. I hope that I might still merit such support in a future RfA, some time in the new year once I have a bit more wiki-time under my belt. If any of you have any thoughts, I'm happy to hear them. Thanks again, to all, and cheers! --PeruvianLlama(spit) 09:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Nomination declined, per above.

Support

  1. Why, yes. The nominator has covered almost all there is to say, too. NSLE (T+C+CVU) 10:01, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Dang you NSLE, the Nom gets the first vote! (per me!)--негіднийлють (Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS) 10:02, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 10:28, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 11:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Good vandal figther and being an admin would help everyone fighting vandalism in wikipedia-en-vandalism on freenode as we need some admins and Peruvianllama would make a great admin --Adam1213 Talk + 11:33, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support I can see no reason not to, I am prepared to support providing the candidate accepts and replies to the questions for candidate. Seems a positive user. Ian13 11:40, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Strong support Who cares if he declines? Blackcap (talk) 21:26, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Peruvianllama&oldid=1144696184"