Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Llampadari

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Llampadari

Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 19:24, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Nomination

Llampadari (talk · contribs) – My name is Kris Hodaj.I have 60 edits. Kris Hodaj 19:24, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: Administrators

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: Everything related to Albanian.Becouse they are a little poor.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: No I haven`t.

General comments

• Links for Llampadari: Llampadari (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for Llampadari can be found here.
• Promote Llampadari (bureaucrats only)

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Llampadari before commenting.

Discussion

Oppose

2. Thank you for submitting your RFA. While I applaud enthusiasm, I'm afraid you do not yet possess sufficient knowledge and experience for the community to have confidence in your readiness to become an admin. But that does not mean that we will never have confidence in you.

   Generally, It has been my experience that it takes at least 3,000 edits in a variety of areas to learn policy and guidelines well enough to attempt adminship. Nominees need to show the ability to contribute a number of significant edits to build the encyclopedia.

   • The Admin tools allow the user to block and unblock other editors, delete and undelete pages and protect and unprotect pages. Nominees will therefore do well to gain experience and familiarity with such areas as WP:AIV, WP:AFD, WP:CSD, Wikipedia:Protection policy, and WP:BLOCK to learn when to do these things.
   • Adminship inevitably leads one to 1) need to explain clearly the reasons for one's decisions, 2) need to review one's decisions and change one's mind when it is reasonable to do so, 3) need to review one's decisions and stand firm when it is reasonable to do so, 4) need to negotiate a compromise. Admins need a familiarity with dispute resolution. The ability to communicate clearly is essential.
   • Article building is the raison d'être of Wikipedia. I recommend significant participation in WP:GA or WP:FA as the surest way to gain article building experience.
   • My suggestion would be to withdraw and try again in another 3 months and 3000 edits. Many nominees have found it helpful to obtain an Editor Review or to receive Admin coaching before submitting their RfA and after passing that benchmark. Hope this helps. Good luck and happy editing. Xclamation point 19:33, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

3. Per X!. -download | sign! 19:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
4. Per X!.--Giants27 ^T/C 19:36, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
5. Strong oppose because 1.) most of your talk page consists of warnings for copyright violations, 2.) you're nominating yourself for adminship fairly soon after an approx. 3-week break from editing, 3.) you only have about 60 edits overall, 4.) extremely vague answers to the questions, and 5.) per X! above. --Dylan620 _{Efforts · Toolbox} 19:38, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
6. Oppose due to warnings. Wizardman 19:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
7. Oppose and suggest closure as NOTNOW. I used to wonder whether X! made a template for those sorta opposes...Cheers. I'^mperator 19:41, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Per the opposes, not wishing to pile on. Meetare Shappy ^Cunkelfratz! 19:38, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.