Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kefo77
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Kefo77[edit]
Final (1/3/1); Withdrawn by candidate at 19:52, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Kefo77 (talk · contribs) - Kefo77 (talk) 19:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kefo77 withdraws. Thank you for your moral support and advice. Cheers Kefo77 (talk) 19:51, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate[edit]
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: Vandalism
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: All of them
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: None
General comments[edit]
- See Kefo77's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
- Links for Kefo77: Kefo77 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Kefo77 before commenting.
Discussion[edit]
Support[edit]
- Moral Support please continue to edit Wikipedia and build up your experience in administrative areas, as well as building content, and reapply in half a year or so if you so feel the need. Remember, adminship is no big deal and just because this RfA will fail does not mean that future one's will. Kind regards. NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 19:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose[edit]
- Oppose due to lack of experience and the sorta-answers to the questions, which don't really show anything about the users temperament, attitude and so on. Ironholds (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose No experience in admin related areas, unstaisfying nswers to questions, few edits overall and in a limited area and none for two months before this RfA. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:25, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose You've got less than 500 edits, which is nowhere near enough for me to decide if you've got a decent knowledge of Wikipedia's policies and practices. Your answers to the questions are brief and uninformative. Please try again in a few months. Reyk YO! 19:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral[edit]
- I'm going to avoid what will be a snowy pileon and say: work on making more contributions and becoming more oriented on Wikipedia before running for adminship. You'll be considered at that point (I can't say specifically when) and will be more likely to succeed. --tennisman 19:47, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]