Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jrdioko

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Jrdioko[edit]

Jrdioko has welcomed a ton of people, he's made over 2000 edits, and has been here since March 13. I think he'd make a great admin--and also, I'm getting sick of having to deal with the stuff he tags for speedy deletion. Meelar 20:26, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Meelar for the nomination, I accept. While I usually stick to taking care of smaller tasks on the Wikipedia and probably wouldn't end up using all the admin privileges right away, I do think a rollback link for vandalism and the ability to speedily delete speedy delete pages would come in handy.  – Jrdioko (Talk) 20:55, May 28, 2004 (UTC)

Support

  1. Meelar 20:26, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  2. anthony (see warning) 04:27, 29 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Guanaco 16:00, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Snowspinner 19:18, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support --"DICK" CHENEY 22:25, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ugen64 17:45, May 31, 2004 (UTC)
  7. BCorr|Брайен 20:26, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC) Excellent contributor.
  8. Danny 02:29, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  9. Tuf-Kat 20:36, Jun 2, 2004 (UTC)
  10. 172 21:10, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. UninvitedCompany 18:07, 30 May 2004 (UTC) Respectfully oppose. This nomination is premature. UninvitedCompany 18:07, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Too early. Maximus Rex 18:09, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. I don't oppose, but I would rather wait another month before supporting. Two months seems a little early in this case. Angela. 22:30, 29 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  1. (originally under neutral) anthony (see warning) I can't find any of the speedy deletions being referred to.
    • I know there was at least one within an hour of this post, and I seem to remember at least one more during the past couple hours. Meelar 20:46, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
    • I believe deleting an article erases everything from its page history and the user contributions of those who made edits to it, so none of the pages I tagged to be deleted should be in my contributions (unless, of course, they was never deleted).  – Jrdioko (Talk) 21:00, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
    • Ah, good point. I was thinking you used Wikipedia:Speedy deletions, but if all you did was add the tag that's not going to be anywhere in the history. Looking at meelar's deletions in that time period, they look indisputable, so I'll move my vote to support. anthony (see warning) 04:27, 29 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]