Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jet123

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Jet123[edit]

Final (0/10/0); Ended 12:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Jet123 (talk · contribs) - I am a Wikipedian and I like to visit Wikipedia.Jet123 07:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept.

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A:Blocking users who did something wrong.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:The articles are good and I will take are of them.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:Yes, I have that in the past.

General comments

I want to be an admin... in five days or less. Please elect me for this. I will try my best to use my powers and I am learning to be an admin...

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Oppose Less than one month experience, nondescript answers, unfamiliarity with Wikipedia due to short time with account, and very few edits. Michael 08:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Your edit history suggests you have very little experience with Wikipedia policy. I suggest you withdraw this nomination, read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship and come back once you have more experience. —dgies^t_c 08:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe I am missing them, but when I look through the edits I'm not seeing any AIV or AfD edits. Without a good knowledge of basic admin tasks, I cannot support. While you may want to block users that have done something wrong...I'm not sure if you know what the policies are to safely judge right and wrong. IrishGuy ^talk 08:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose- many problems, starting with "Blocking users who did something wrong"...--The preceding comment was signed by Us e r:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 09:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per above, and your answers really need work if you want to pass next time. ^Khukri 09:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, also, not enough edits/experience yet overall. Maybe later! - Denny 09:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close Sorry, with an edit count like that this candidate has no chance of getting adminship at present. --Folantin 10:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Your willingness to help Wikipedia is greatly appeciated, but you do not have sufficient experience to help out as an administrator at this time. Please reapply when you have more experience. --Deskana (talk) 10:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeYou only have made 332 edits over a less than one month period, this is too inactive for an adminstrator, you have forgot to sign your acceptance of the nomination, you show no real need for the tools and the answers to the standard questions are very weak, you have never used an edit summary this is not good for admin candidates please see Wikipedia:What adminship is not as I doubt you understand this, give it another six months and much more activity and show a need for the tools and make the answers to the standard questions much stronger and you'll pass but for the minute it has to be oppose.Best Regards - Tellyaddict (Talk) 10:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The fourth WP:SNOW case this week. - Anas ^Talk? 11:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.