Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hastingssaxonspride

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Hastingsaxonspride

Final: (0/6/0); Ended 23:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC) in accordance with WP:SNOW. Acalamari 23:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Hastingsaxonspride (talk · contribs) - vetern Languge Arts teacher and History TeacherHastingsaxonspride 21:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

I Accept

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I intend to help improve and protect this site in anyway I can.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: I have made some minor edits in the Sites to help improve the quality.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I have seen so many people rude with their destruction of the websites that i jusy turn them into a adminstrator for sansations.

General comments

• See Hastingsaxonspride's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for Hastingsaxonspride: Hastingsaxonspride (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Hastingsaxonspride before commenting.

Discussion

Oppose

1. Oppose And....why should you be an admin? You've been here for three and a half hours. Admins are...well...experienced? You've made ONE mainspace edit. I'm sorry, but are you nowhere near remotely close to ready. You can't even list your own RfA correctly, and you clearly don't understand what an admin does. Being a teacher is not grounds for becoming an admin. NASCARFan24^{(radio me!●ER)} 22:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
2. Oppose I'm going to assume good faith here and presume you don't know what an admin does. You've given no indication of why you want to be an admin, you haven't bothered to read the instructions on how to request adminship, and you have precisely one mainspace contribution. Withdraw this now; I guarantee it won't pass. — iridescent 22:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
3. Strong Oppose Not nearly enough experience yet. Only created account 3 hours ago. Kesac 22:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
4. Sorry, but no. FYI, most editors on this site don't suddenly show up and nominate themselves for adminship just a few hours after joining, not having a clue what adminship really entails. Maser ^(Talk!) 22:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
5. Oppose. Not enough experience. Miranda 23:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
6. Oppose Close this RfA early and gain experience of editing and contributing to the various project spaces over the course of six months or so before returning with a strong business case for your adminiship proposal. You have less than fifty edits and do not demonstrate a knowledge of policy or process that is required of admins around the project. (aeropagitica) 23:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.