Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Curtis23
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Curtis23[edit]
Closed per WP:NOTNOW by Ktr101- Final (0/4/1); Ended 03:40, 22 December 2009
Nomination[edit]
Curtis23 (talk · contribs) – I have been on Wikipedia since the end of June and have been editing almost everyday since I joined. I take part in a lot of discussions and always stay with them. I have about 800 edits so I make about 10-15 edits a day I try to help Wikipedia by making new pages and work on some in subpages. Curtis23 (talk) 02:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate[edit]
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
I will stop vandilism (In discussion or blocking if one editor is consitant).
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:
My best contributions are probably in discussions to make Wikipedia better (a lot in AfDs) becuase it helps to have only noteable pages on Wikipedia and that the pages are good.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I've been in 1 conflict over editing but I dealt with it by just taking a block and then just stopping consistant reverting. Sometimes I get stressed but nothing big.
General comments[edit]
- Links for Curtis23: Curtis23 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Curtis23 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/USERNAME before commenting.
Discussion[edit]
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support[edit]
Oppose[edit]
- Sorry, but your block was only four months ago in time and less than a thousand edits ago in experience. ϢereSpielChequers 03:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose This user has proven time and time again on Talk:Curt Hawkins and Zack Ryder that they don't possess the maturity, patience, or common sense to become an administrator. iMatthew talk at 03:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per WP:NOTNOW. I believe you are not yet experienced enough. Your answers above were not satisfactory. I would recommend to snow this. > RUL3R>trolling>vandalism 03:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose Blocked for edit warring too recently, doesn't have nearly enough experience. fetchcomms☛ 03:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral[edit]
- Please don't take this as a discouragement for the future, but you simply do not have enough edits currently to pass a request for adminship. Most successful candidates have at least 4,000 edits under their belt. If I were you I'd withdraw your candidacy, as really nobody has a chance with only 800 edits. -kotra (talk) 03:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.