Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Courtney Akins
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Courtney Akins[edit]
Final (2/2/1) ended 04:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC) (officially closed many years later)
Courtney Akins (talk · contribs) – Hi! :) I have been on Wikipedia long enough and have many edits by now, so I think I am gonna be a good admin. I also have a college education. I know I will be able to help Wikipedia a lot. Thanks.Courtney Akins 04:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
- I accept.Courtney Akins 04:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A:
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
- Comments
- See Courtney Akins's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool.
- Current tally: (2/2/1)
Support[edit]
- Weak Support. I'd say good user, but wait awhile. I see from the first oppose this prolly won't succeed. On another note, I also like the way this was formatted since I can jump to the comments, though others might not agree. Mostly Rainy 04:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Good contributor. Wasn't trolling, that's just what the admin claimed. ⇒ JarlaxleArtemis 04:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose[edit]
- Not to be rude Courtney, but you just been unblocked for trolling, and the length was originally indef. I would go as far as to support that block now because you're editing here has been increasingly disruptive. You clearly don't understand some of the policies and guidelines here on Wikipedia and you are undeserving of adminship. And for your own sake, I would suggest withdrawing this nomination. (NOTE: After making this RFA, she was blocked for an hour by Lar for disruptive behavior and going against her recommended mentorship). — The Future 04:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - without even looking at your block, I'd strongly suggest you withdrawl based on inexperience. You didn't even answer the questions above before listing the RfA, and you joined about three weeks ago and have only 132 edits (only 15 of which are in the Mainspace). Though there is no official standard, most editors will not support an editor who has less than several months of experience and 3000+ edits. Please don't take this personally - just work on editing articles and becoming more familiar with Wikipedia's policy. You might want to read some editors' standardcs in voting in RfAs and waiting three months minimum before requesting adminship again. Fabricationary 04:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral[edit]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.