Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chancemill

Chancemill

A great user - should've been made admin a while ago. 172 07:08, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the nomination. It is nice to be appreciated, and I accept it with all humility. I hope to continue to deserve your faith in me, and be of good use to the project. Chancemill 12:49, Apr 29, 2004 (UTC)

Support

1. 172 07:08, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
2. Support. Chancemill has edited some contentious topics and remained calm in his discussion of them. Seems to handle conflict well. Angela 08:16, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
3. Angela never lies. --Merovingian ↕ Talk 08:17, Apr 29, 2004 (UTC)
4. BCorr|Брайен 12:14, Apr 29, 2004 (UTC)
5. I especially regard it important to have admins with knowledge about topics that are not among the most common ones the mainstream user tends to contribute to. To me it seems that Chancemill's interest in Indian and Hindu topics as well as a variety of others are very valuable for wikipedia. Get-back-world-respect 19:18, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
6. Jwrosenzweig 22:02, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
7. Danny 23:20, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
8. --H CHENEY 04:22, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC) I agree with Angela and Get-back-world-respect
9. Excellent contributor,balanced, very friendly, sensitive, good flair for writing. KRS 14:48, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
10. Cribcage 22:12, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
11. john 04:23, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
12. Meelar 01:33, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
13. Guanaco 05:00, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
14. Though English is his second language, he is *very* good in English; and also very *helpful* in correcting grammar and polishing articles. Also, very knowledgeable in Tamil, Sanskrit and Hindi. --Rrjanbiah 05:24, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
15. Polite and easy to deal with, a fine wikipedian. Sam Spade 05:11, 4 May 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Far too few edits thus far, IMHO. Kingturtle 00:59, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
2. Agreed. Sporadic edits to few distinct articles. +sj+ 20:39, 2004 May 5 (UTC)