Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Blctc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Nomination
[edit]Final (0/1/0); Closed per WP:NOTNOW by — Aitias // discussion at 17:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Blctc (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER broadwaybobby (talk) 17:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, I accept-Bobby:
please vote for me becasue i will help better wikipedia and work to stop vandilism
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: Make sure wikipedia has fair and unbiased correct information
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: making a page for my school and editing part monsers cab for the winners to show people who won
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: no i have not had issues with other users
General comments
[edit]- Links for Blctc: Blctc (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/USERNAME before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]- You don't need to be an admin to do good article work on wikipedia. Suggest withdrawal.--Pattont/c 17:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I second that, plus you've only made like 30 edits.--Giants27 TC 17:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support
[edit]
Oppose
[edit]- Oppose - Sorry dude, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too soon. --Dylan620 Hark unto me @ 17:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.