Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Baseballrocks538
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/3/0); ended 23:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC) - WP:NOTNOW. —cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 520,889,097) 23:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]
Nomination
[edit]Baseballrocks538 (talk · contribs) – I would be a good admin becuase i have been with WIKIPEDIA for years and always try to help wikipedia. I am responsible, and always want to help build Wikiepdia. Please consider me.Baseballrocks538 (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
General comments
[edit]- Links for Baseballrocks538: Baseballrocks538 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Baseballrocks538 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
Support
[edit]
Oppose
[edit]- Strongest Oppose This user clearly does not understand policy and failed to fill out this RfA.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 520,888,340) 23:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per warnings on user's talk page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but WP:NOTYET. You need a lot more than 158 edits before we can properly evaluate you for adminship. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.