Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Azer Red

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Azer Red

Voice your opinion (1/5/2); Scheduled to end 00:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Azer Red (talk · contribs) (formerly known as User:Rouge Rosado) – Haven't accumulated a lot of edits with this account yet, but have been familiar with Wikimedia projects for a while, and know how things work. I would like to get more involved in the admin's noticeboard and help fight vandalism and other admin activities. Azer Red Si? 00:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Self-nom--Azer Red Si? 00:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I would like to help resolve disputes on the admin noticeboard and would be willing to revert and fight vandalism.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: I've done a fair deal of cleanup and improvement of Dungeons and Dragons-related articles and I've created a few stubs such as Mercurial sword and keep a general eye out for mistakes and ways that articles could be improved.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Haven't had much trouble with other users so far. I've made sure to ask for others opinions before making controversial decisions and try to avoid agitating tense situations.

General comments

• See Azer Red's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

---

Discussion

Support

1. Moral Support I understand that you have good intentions but please withdraw as you clearly need more experience. — Seadog 02:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Answer to Q1 clearly demonstrates that the user does not know about the admin tools. There is no need for admin tools to do the things you have specified in Q1. – Chacor 00:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

   I do know the admin tools. I want to be able to block vandals and issue resolutions on WP:AN stuff. I know I can help out with that stuff somewhat without admin tools. but it would be more convenient for me if I had it.

2. Oppose. Not enough experience or edits yet. Try waiting a few more months. –The Great Llama^moo? 01:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
3. Oppose and suggest withdrawal User has clearly demonstrated lack of readiness. User needs to gain more experience editing, contributing and taking part in Admin related tasks. With first edit in September and < 2000 total edits, user does not have the experience for adminship. Recommend user withdraw and consider submitting RfA 3 months and 3,000 edits from now. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 01:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
4. Oppose Unfortunately I believe that the user is too inexperienced as demonstrated by the time he spent here and his responses to the questions. TSO1D 01:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
5. Oppose; I've looked at all your contribution and you don't have enough edits and not enough experience. Sorry.--PrestonH 03:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Neutral. I don't like to oppose, but the answers to the questions demonstrate a lack of knowledge of the admin tools. bibliomaniac15 01:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
2. Neutral. I suggest withdrawing this RfA, as it is apparent that you need more experience on Wikipedia. However, keep making good edits like you've been doing so far, and you'll be fine. Nishkid64 02:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Withdraw You're probably right that I don't have enough edits yet. Okay, I withdraw this nom.--Azer Red Si? 02:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.