Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Andres

Andres[edit]

I would like to nominate Andres for adminship. Andres is a very intelligent and level-headed contributor that researches articles very thoroughly. (He has been around since April of this year I think, has about 1000 total edits, 850 non-minor, 550 non-minor and non-Wikipedia/User/Talk related for those who care :) Dori | Talk 03:49, Dec 10, 2003 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating me. I don't oppose adminship though I don't need the sysop status. I spend most of the time on the Estonian Wikipedia and here I edit only articles I am interested in because of their content. Andres 04:15, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Support. I especially like his edit summaries. silsor 04:10, Dec 10, 2003 (UTC)
Support. --Wik 04:13, Dec 10, 2003 (UTC)
Support if he thinks he'll use it. If not, I oppose. I don't think it's necessarily good to have inactive sysops. (He is definitely active enough as an editor and has sufficient experience for me to support otherwise.) Daniel Quinlan 04:39, Dec 10, 2003 (UTC)
Support, -- G-Man 13:34, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- I would not be an active sysop. I would use my adminship very rarely, if at all. Andres 04:46, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- I don't think inactivity as a sysop should be an issue. If Andres only uses his extra buttons to delete a nonsense page once in a blue moon that's OK (or even if he doesn't). I use mine rarely myself, and don't see that as a problem at all. -- sannse 08:51, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- I certainly hope there isn't a required page deletion quota for all sysops... Damn, forgot to block someone today, I'll probably get my Wikipedia salary for today halved... Κσυπ Cyp 16:56, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Support, I think that Estonian Wikipedia also needs a sysop. Also, I found that Andres is available there almost all time (24/7) and thats the main. Also He is the founder of Estonian Wikipedia, if I may say so. -- Egon 20:12, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)