Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Addatron

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

addatron

Final (0/2/0) ended 03:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

addatron (talk · contribs) – a good firm but kind user will not hesitate to end the acounts of known vandles Addatron 09:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:i fully and happly accept

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose please gain more work and interaction experience. Your RfA is improperly organized and you don't have a good idea of what being an admin requires. Rama's Arrow 03:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
2. Oppose as per above. Of your twelve edits, four have been in respect of this RfA. I suggest that you get a good few more edits under your belt and think carefully about the presentation of your RfA before making your next request. -- Alias Flood 18:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A:bloking known vandles, standerd editing pages and unbloking inocent users(with proof, natualy)

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:wollmers estate my dad is the manager of the estate and i am proud to contribute

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:i will deal with any i have with a simple "whatever" and silent treatment because its not worth it

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.