Wikipedia:Requested moves/Other proposals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Purge the cache to refresh this page

28 January 2009[edit]

  • The ODESSA FileThe Odessa File —(Discuss)— I propose to revert a move that was made without discussion and based on incorrect assumption. The alleged ODESSA organization is most often called ODESSA with capitalization due to its being an acronym. Some editors assume that both film and book also use that same capitalization. However, they do not. The original Hutchinson & Co book release from 1972 clearly makes a distinction between the title and the organization, and Forsyth himself makes that distinction in the author's note and foreword, referring to the organization as ODESSA initially (Odessa later) and to the book as The Odessa File consistently. User Barbatus moved the article The Odessa File to The ODESSA File without previous discussion, and explaining the move was made because of the acronym. I contacted Barbatus about this, but get the impression he may be less active than before, so I chose to use the talk page instead. Wurdnurd (talk) 00:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC) --Wurdnurd (talk) 00:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Highfield MoleTunnels (book) —(Discuss)— The book is named Tunnels both nationally and internationally, and is not advertised with the name "The Highfield Mole." Readers looking for the book, without knowing its publication history, will have a hard time finding it. It would be better to have the old title link to the proper title of "Tunnels". --Dracoster (talk) 00:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Dracoster (talk) 00:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mehmet ÖzMehmet Oz —(Discuss)— Correct spelling. All references refer to him as "Oz". There has been a recurring problem with some people insisting that Wikipedia use the historic Turkish spelling, despite the references. Note that the talk page is already properly named. --Studerby (talk) 21:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • True loveTrue Love —(Discuss)— Disambiguation page where all the disambiguated entries are titles capitalized as True Love. Seems very obvious and uncontroversial to me, but since there was a previous discussion about 18 months ago that ended with no consensus (although all of the reasons for disagreement seem very poor, at least applied to the page's current version) it seemed like I should list it here. There's an edit history at True Love anyway. --Propaniac (talk) 21:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jordan (Katie Price)Jordan (model born 1978) —(Discuss)— The current title is a rather ghastly compromise, and this format is not used on high-quality articles. The (x born 19xx) disambiguation variant appears fitting here and avoids any questions over whether we should be using her maiden or current name when she doesn't go by either consistently and is far better known as Jordan. --Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 16:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

27 January 2009[edit]

26 January 2009[edit]

25 January 2009[edit]

  • Cup of PortugalTaça de Portugal —(Discuss)— This is the name that the competitions is most commonly known by, as proven by a quick Google search. Searching for "Cup of Portugal" only returns 15,100 hits, while searching for "Taca de Portugal", which automatically includes "Taça de Portugal", returns 325,000 hits. – PeeJay 18:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relisted to garner more input towards consensus.--Aervanath (talk) 07:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

24 January 2009[edit]

  • Peter LekoPéter Lékó —(Discuss)— Name of this Hungarian person has diacritics; this article is one of the last few to resist Wikipedia's tradition to use Latin alphabet diacritics when applicable, for the sake of encyclopedic accuracy. --Húsönd 11:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

23 January 2009[edit]

  • Said Ali al-ShihriSa'id Ali Jabir Al Khathim Al Shihri —(Discuss)— This move should be made to revert a recent unilateral, undiscussed move. It is unclear whether the new name is actually for the same person as the existing article was about, as I will explain further on the talk page. This is a BLP issue. I moved it once, and the other hasty contributor moved it back, without waiting for my explanation on the talk page, otherwise I would have listed this as an uncontroversial request. Geo Swan (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC) --Geo Swan (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog[edit]

Move dated sections here after five days have passed (May 15 or older).