Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 3
May 5 >

May 4[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 4, 2024.

Airport route[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Airport#Access and onward travel. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 23:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's impossible to associate this term with a single article, and I doubt a dab will be useful either. Propose retargeting to somewhere like Airport#Access_and_onward_travel or deleting. NotAGenious (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone merge Airport Route with this nomination? NotAGenious (talk) 16:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting since the second redirect wasn't tagged until now, and considering that a new target was brought up late in the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Na Sé Contaethe[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. After two relists, editors remain divided between keep, retarget, and delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a plausible search term. Also not mentioned in target (I tried ctrl+f/F3) JuniperChill (talk) 21:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated Na Se Contaethe per the two comments below for the same reason JuniperChill (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 07:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shhhnotsoloud / @Okmrman  Done JuniperChill (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nanashi (MÄR)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Jay 💬 20:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Separating this out from the below because there is an episode of the manga titled just "Nanashi" so this could justifiably be thought of as a redirect for that. But really people typing this are likely to be looking for the character, on whom there's not enough substance to warrant a redirect. Has prior history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 06:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 04:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but retarget to the chapter list. I don't see a reason to delete it since it's mentioned and redirects are WP:CHEAP. Link20XX (talk) 15:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Turing recognizable[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 19#Turing recognizable

Doctor (rapper)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 17#Doctor (rapper)

Dr. Rapp[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Apparently, the subject of these redirects is in regards to a true story (doctor who became a rapper after the doctor had a blackout) that Netflix bought the rights for in 2019. However, 2019 seems to be where all the news about this ends. There is no other information on Wikipedia about this subject. Steel1943 (talk) 18:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2025 PDC World Darts Championship[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion. The 2025 WC is not mentioned in the target article yet.
The previous PDC Darts WC articles were created months before they started, when there was some official info about them. ArtiK-99 (talk) 16:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Latin peoples[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 19#Latin peoples

Getting Out Our Dreams II LLC[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created at WP:AFC/R. My concerns regarding these redirects are the same as I left as a comment there: judging from this 2022 Variety article, I'm not sure that this is the same company - the fact that Getting Out Our Dreams II, LLC is referenced in that article as a variation on the name of his earlier label, Getting Out Our Dreams makes me feel like this company might not be the same thing as GOOD Music. If it isn't the same company, I worry that having this redirect might cause confusion to our readers, by implying to those who are redirected from this term that this is a company name for the GOOD Music we have an article on (which, according to this RS, would seem to be incorrect). I'm not sure what the best thing to do here is, so bringing to RfD for more thoughts, but would lean in favour of deletion if a better solution can't be found. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 06:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A smart kitten I definitely didn’t do well for not telling you why I went ahead to accept the request even though I saw your comment. I actually did a bit of research and found some song releases where Kanye West was the artist and the label was “Getting Out Our Dreams” then at the copyright text, it was “Getting Out Our Dreams II LLC”. I’m currently mobile, I’d drop what I saw later. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanderwaalforces: Please feel free to link what you saw; however, I'm not sure if that would confirm them as being the same company - according to the Variety article, Kanye's contracts have been renegotiated more than once, meaning that it seems possible to me that the songs might have been released under GOOD Music initially and the copyright later transferred to Getting Out Our Dreams II, LLC. For example, The Life of Pablo mentions that it was released through GOOD Music, but the Variety article states that [t]he copyright on all of his albums from 2016’s “Life of Pablo” album onward is credited to his company [GOOD II LLC]. I'll admit that this is quite a murky situation, though - the Variety article was the only RS I was able to find that mentioned GOOD II, and the company names being similar doesn't help! All the best ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 07:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A smart kitten I got it now, hehe. [1], go to the More information tab and you'll find "Getting Out Our Dreams II, LLC" as one of the copyright holders. You will also agree with me that [2] the direct album on Spotify also credits "Getting Out Our Dreams II, LLC". This is sufficient for me to have accepted this redirect request. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanderwaalforces: With respect, I'm still not persuaded/convinced that these are the same company. I'm worried that inferring that GOOD II LLC is the same company as GOOD Music based on an online store including both names in a product description is WP:SYNTH; especially in the face of an RS that directly refers to GOOD II LLC as a variation on the name of his earlier label GOOD Music. As I mentioned above, the copyrights might have been transferred since the album's initial release, which could have resulted in both companies being linked to an album despite being not being connected to each other. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 17:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A smart kitten I have no prejudice against deleting these redirects, I have no personal interest. Perhaps they should be deleted. You’re doing a great job, by the way. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

United Penn Bank[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mellon Financial. Jay 💬 10:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only mention of "United" comes from the United States. The only mention of "Penn" is within Pennsylvania. Besides that, no mention of "United Penn", or "Penn Bank" at the target article. Apparently might be a predecessor in the building, and the article is tagged with possibilities, but if this isn't mentioned at the target it may be better off to convert this into a red link to encourage article creation, if the possibility is indeed there. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak retarget to Mellon Financial and tag with possibilities Okmrman (talk) 15:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Evil Mario[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 19#Evil Mario

PORTIA[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 17#PORTIA

Russell Westbrick[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There was no further participation despite a relist. Jay 💬 10:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RNEUTRAL and WP:RFD#DELETE. Also it is never discussed nor mentioned in the article. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep as navigationally useful. The nickname is used by WP:RS e.g. [3] and it is plausible that someone not familiar with him or American sports in general might search the phrase based off something they see in sports media or just in a forum post where his actual name is not mentioned. Should be re-tagged with Template:R from non-neutral name rather than Template:R from alternative name.
Remember WP:RNEUTRAL explicitly allows non-neutral but verifiable redirects, and states they should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. You declined to specify which part of WP:RFD#DELETE applies which makes that hard to examine, but WP:RFD#K3 certainly applies here. Redirects from pejorative nicknames are rather common actually. For example just from a quick scroll I see His Fraudulency, Big Yud, Bastard brat, Milk Snatcher, Mark Uterus, President Pooh, Pootin, Fredo Cuomo.
I don't know how likely it is for someone who doesn't follow the NBA to run across this, and someone who already follows the NBA will know who it refers to already, which is why my keep is weak here, but it seems plausible that will happen every so often. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:49B:2883:34FC:225B (talk) 14:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rape of Nancheng[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Doolittle Raid#Zhejiang-Jiangxi campaign. ✗plicit 00:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: neither rape nor Nancheng are mentioned in the article, the term has virtually no views and I only found it when trying to find other articles known as 'Rape of X'. I did contact the creator of the redirect but he didn't respond Traumnovelle (talk) 03:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jonny cochrane[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 17#Jonny cochrane

Bedbg bite[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, misspelled Plantdrew (talk) 03:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

G-Men(Slang)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible for speedy due to being redirected as a result of a previous AFD, nonetheless this is an unecessary redirect with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation that has only minor page history and no incoming links from mainspace. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A490:821A:272C:B909 (talk) 03:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, especially considering no edit history at title. Steel1943 (talk) 16:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete it was at this title for a few days in 2006 and also has a capitalization error. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete due to malformed dabifier --Lenticel (talk) 08:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cetian[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. Using the search function results in hits for several articles, mainly the works of Ursula K. Le Guin (e.g. The Word for World Is Forest), but also Cerberus (board game), Tim Sullivan (writer), and Ariaethus of Tegea. I don't think there is an obvious "correct" target here. TompaDompa (talk) 00:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Name of several unrelated fictional elements, none of which have their own articles. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_May_4&oldid=1225180504"