Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 25[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 25, 2023.

First-person adventure[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 2#First-person adventure

Imitation City[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3#Imitation City

Sociomusicological research methods[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3#Sociomusicological research methods

Green Day's 8th Studio Album[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Red. doesn't exist for any other of the band's albums (or any other band's albums for that matter), meaning a similar red. would have to exist for EVERY album article; WP:PANDORA. In addition, it's very unlikely someone would look for 21cb with "Green Day's 8th Studio Album". Sincerely, Key of G Minor. Tools: (talk, contribs) 14:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I don't see how WP:PANDORA can be cited here when this is over 15 years old, and has been a redirect to the current target since the 2010 discussion - any such issue would be clear by now but these kinds of redirects seem to be rare. Why would we need to create similar redirects for other albums? This was originally a WP:TOOSOON stub about the current target, and should have been deleted in 2007 rather than being BLARed, but I don't see any reason to delete now. A7V2 (talk) 04:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per A7V2 – and even if it did mean that redirects for other albums should be created (by bot, as no one would ever see this redirect and go 'I must manually create 100,000 more'), why is that a bad thing? J947edits 05:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Xinjiang in the Turkvision Song Contest[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Kumyks and Stavropol Krai were never tagged for deletion. Please nominate these separately. plicit 14:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All articles fail WP:GNG (WP:SIGCOV) and similar articles related to this contest have gone through AfD recently or are currently going through AfD and show precedence for failure to warrant standalone articles (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of languages in the Turkvision Song Contest, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkvision Song Contest 2016, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyumen Oblast in the Turkvision Song Contest, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan in the Turkvision Song Contest). As the majority of "[country/region] in the Turkvision Song Contest" articles have been deleted, or most likely will be deleted following recent AfD, the case for continuing to host redirects for these specific regions is minimal. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 08:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 09:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. These redirects are unlikely search terms as these countries have either never participated in the contest or have only done so on one occasion. As indicated in the nom, the particulars of a country's participation don't appear to meet notability guidelines in general. I'd also support this deletion as general housekeeping as these redirects are unlikely to ever become articles in the future. Grk1011 (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • I also support deleting the subsequent additions to this nom mentioned in the replies below. Grk1011 (talk) 12:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Grk1011. - Kevo327 (talk) 09:32, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural relist – Dagestan + Kazakh Uyghurs added to discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947edits 10:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 07:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of television series that contents police[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The title didn't make sense back in 2007 when it was moved (back) to its target, and does not make sense now either (at least I don't get it, does it?). Nabla (talk) 10:13, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I think whoever made this (awful) move meant "List of television series that contain police". The article was at this title for ~4 days back in 2007. Usually we try really hard to keep {{R from move}}s, to avoid breaking external links and such. But this one is so nonsensical... Mdewman6 (talk) 22:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of BL drama[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3#List of BL drama

Michelle Jones-Watson(Marvel Cinematic Universe)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:R3 and WP:RDAB. Valid redirect is at Michelle Jones-Watson (Marvel Cinematic Universe). Gonnym (talk) 09:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

1.9 Public transport in Canterbury[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3#1.9 Public transport in Canterbury

Wikipedia:Don't be attracted the infobox's bright colors[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 05:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar was incorrect so I moved the page, didn't want to create a redirect Sincerely, Key of G Minor. Tools: (talk, contribs) 02:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tagged for speedy deletion per G7, since the author is requesting deletion. CycloneYoris talk! 02:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).