Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 16, 2023.

Pinocchio (upcoming stop-motion film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No longer upcoming. Steel1943 (talk) 22:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Smash burger[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 23#Smash burger

Improper point[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 26#Improper point

Alex Shieh[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural close as a problematic and misleading nomination. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted because Alex Shieh currently bears no relation to the article and makes no sense. In a previous version of the article, Shieh was mentioned briefly in a single line as the founder of a club, but consensus has removed that piece from the page. Furthermore, the creator User:Stopasianhate repeatedly edits to Phillips Academy#The Phillips Academy Poll to put Shieh's name back onto the article, suggesting this redirect may also be a form of self-promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1000:b108:8df7:8c34:d691:6968:1890 (talk) 04:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Claimed user's contibs do not show any edits to the Phillips Academy article. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – IP's summary appears to be very misleading. This part of the article is currently getting reworked, and has been the subject of an edit war in the past few weeks. There does not seem to be consensus to keep or delete that part of the article, and Stopasianhate has made only one edit on the page so far, seemingly to revert the state of it prior to the recent disruptive edits though it did result in only the sentence mentioning Alex Shieh as the founder of a research institute being brought back.
It's perhaps too early to say whether Alex Shieh will be mentioned in the final version of the article or not. I would say delete until it's clear Alex Shieh's name will stay in the article, but the reverse of keeping until it's clear his name will not be kept on the article is reasonable as well. Randi Moth (talk) 17:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, SONIC678 16:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete- Alex Shieh's name does not currently appear in the article. I don't remember what the "Alex Shieh Institite" was, but I think that was a joke by one of his classmates and not a real thing. We can always make the redirect again if we need to. Round and rounder (talk) 21:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC) WP:STRIKESOCK {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 19:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural close as a problematic RfD where the nomination appears to be misleading, and Round and rounder who removed mention from the article, and who is a participant, has been blocked as a sock. Jay 💬 07:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

You can't do this on Nintendo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 20:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article. Also created by a sockpuppet. G5 was declined. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom - even when created (targeting the now removed Sega Genesis#Console wars), while there were slogans in that section, this one was not among them [1]. A7V2 (talk) 23:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete while that line came from the same ads as Genesis does what Nintendon't this doesn’t appear to be anywhere near as well known as that is.--70.24.249.205 (talk) 03:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trads[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Trad. (non-admin closure) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 19:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Was originally created back in 2016 as a redirect to Ivy League (clothes), which no longer contains a mention of this term. In 2022, it was retargeted to a new section of Neo-Nazism. However, that section's voracity was challenged at Talk:Neo-Nazism/Archive 5#Trads, and was removed with this edit, so no longer is mentioned there either. Onel5969 TT me 11:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

CCEP[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Any arguments about a primary topic can be taken up in an RM discussion. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 14:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't obviously the primary topic; Coca-Cola Europacific Partners seems to be also something that's plausibly a reasonable target for this acronym, but a dab page might also be warranted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of Pubs in Orange, NSW[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such list at the target or anywhere else, so delete. This was briefly an unsourced article (well, a source was added [2] but this was to a category of a wiki which doesn't appear to have any mention of pubs [3]) which was quickly BLARed to the target which at that time did have a list ([4]), since removed. I don't think it is necessary to restore the article as it was unreferenced but if others feel that it is I am not opposed to it. A7V2 (talk) 05:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: BLARred article that was not merged in in any way. TartarTorte 01:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Endrum Anudan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 06:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned anywhere in target article. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nashdale railway station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 06:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this station anywhere at the current target, nor was there when this redirect was created in 2014. I think best to delete. There is sort of mention at Broken Hill railway line, but I think this is an unsuitable target since no other station name redirects there (with many being redlinks) and since the only mention is in the line map which is collapsed by default. A7V2 (talk) 05:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ümlaut[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 23#Ümlaut

Apostolic Church (1911 denomination)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 04:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The denomination was founded in 1916, not 1911. Since this redirect is misleading, I recommend deletion. Veverve (talk) 13:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please don't delere until all the incoming links have been fixed. StAnselm (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The article states that The earliest historians of the Apostolic Church date its beginnings to 1911 with a citation to this book. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unpaved road[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 2#Unpaved road

Transwiki[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:transwiki. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 19:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Not mentioned in section or page, don't see what transwiki has to do with this section. Rusalkii (talk) 21:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd be open to any fate for this page, but my stance is that this concept extends beyond mediawiki (and therefore solely-internal matters) and is encyclopedic; whether ww currently have content about it is orthogonal to the possibility of pointing an inquirer to at least the context within which the term is usable. Arlo James Barnes 07:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 21:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Seems to be an obscure piece of Wikimedia lingo without any good crosswiki target. No objection to retargeting if an encyclopedic mention is added. Clyde!Franklin! 21:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the current target doesn't help, and the 2021 RfD had it deleted. However, do not leave it as a redlink this time, or it'll just be re-created. The redirect is used in several pages including in mainspace talk page debates and instructions (all outdated). I started off trying to pipe them to the Help page, but at one talk I saw that it was used in the context of the (defunct) WikiProject Transwiki, so was not sure where to pipe them all to. I also see another potential WP target Help:Interwiki linking which is already redirected from mainspace redirects Interwikimedia and Interwikimedia links. Interwiki link redirects to MediaWiki#Interwiki links though. Jay 💬 05:53, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to wikt:transwiki. I imagine someone would be looking this up wondering what this means—the Wiktionary page provides the answer. -- Tavix (talk) 17:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go… Delete or soft redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to wikt:transwiki per above. Also, the proposed target contains info about transwikiing. Mast303 (talk) 15:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_February_16&oldid=1142402934"