Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 31

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 31[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 31, 2023.

Reearthing[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These two should probably be synced, and while I'm able to hunt down usages for both unhyphenated and hyphenated for Ecopsychology (even if the latter isn't a particularly reliable source), the only use I'm seeing of it for human composting is as a literal translation of Reerdigung [de], which while being the German name, also appears to be a company. I don't think that's enough for this to redirect to Human composting over Ecopsychology, and I propose retargeting both to Ecopsychology as such. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 07:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: First thing that came to mind for me was rewiring a building's earthing system. That's probably unlikely, but apparently it's also a specific technical term, as in, If the overhead line (OL) is part of the distribution network, its PEN conductor is generally earthed at several points, by performing a so-called re-earthing of the PEN conductor.[1] Ecopsychology is probably the primary topic though. --Paul_012 (talk) 00:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both. There are no substantive mentions that explain either term anywhere in enwiki. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 23:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Matthew Heappey[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 10#Matthew Heappey

1995 American West Basketball Tournament[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term for the moment, as the target (1995 American West basketball tournament) does not exist. Of course, the most obvious solution is to create that page, then retarget this page there... O.N.R. (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Until that article is created. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete This redirect was created as a result of moving a page with an incorrect title. Fbdave (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Inai Shuji[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mention anywhere in enwiki. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete seems to be the Ranma 1/2 movie director but I can't verify it with reliable sources. English sources that state this are Anime News Network and the Ranma 1/2 Fandom Wiki so it's probably best not to mention them without supporting cites. --Lenticel (talk) 06:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Petrushene, Mykolaiv Raion[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 7#Petrushene, Mykolaiv Raion

Knuckle Joe[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That character is no longer on the list. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bigger Boo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 12:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lemon (anime)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 8#Lemon (anime)

Alonsomania[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. While there's disagreement as to whether a move is in order, there appears to be agreement that a redirect is useful for both attribution and potential future addition of relevant content at the target. signed, Rosguill talk 17:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While the result of a merge, all the content about Alonsomania has been removed at Fernando Alonso's article, so this redirect is without context at its target. TartarTorte 19:56, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 21:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For some input on Jay's proposal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, maybe refine to Fernando Alonso#Image and impact, or even add an #Alonsomania anchor there. For a reader looking for information on the phenomenon, that section contains the information we have. Oppose moving, moving redirects is silly; if those other titles are valid redirects then go create them. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Moving redirects having history to keep attribution is similar to renaming an article at AfD to keep attribution by converting it to a redirect because the current title is not seen as a valid redirect. Jay 💬 02:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

International Funboard Class Association[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mention of this at the target, and no other target that gives any substantive information. I suggest delete to encourage article creation, and consistent with International Board Sailing Association and Funboard Class (windsurfer). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

(CRT)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect that does not aid searches and probably hinders them way from the disambiguation page at CRT, which by my guess accounts for the few dozen page views in the past 30 days. It appears it maybe was just copied from the initialism after first use on pages such as cathode-ray tube or critical race theory?) and as far as I know or can find, it's not an existent meme-y form of the initialism associated with cathode-ray tube televisions. There are no incoming links on wiki. I propose deletion, or if someone it's found to be useful somehow, retarget to the disambiguation page CRT unless "(CRT)" really is associated with the display technology. Skynxnex (talk) 04:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to CRT. I can't explain why but even though this page was only created a couple months ago and isn't a {{R from move}}, it's getting a ton of hits for a redirect, more than 200 in that time. Someone must be using it, maybe an external site. The activity dropped to almost zero a couple weeks ago so maybe whatever was generating that activity has fixed itself, but I think this should point somewhere until we can determine for certain that it's not in use, and the dab page seems like the obvious target. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Retarget to CRT. I can’t see enough of a difference between the title of the redirect and the title of the DAB page that would suggest it should point to a different target. Potentially a {{R from typo}} (or at least a {{R from modification}}). A smart kitten (talk) 02:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to weak retarget following discovery by Paul_012, as I don’t see that much harm in keeping it, but am also now much less botheted about it getting deleted. A smart kitten (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to CRT. Awkward but plausible search term --Lenticel (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    What makes this a more plausible search term than (JFK), (BLM) or (IOS)? StonyBrook babble 18:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Implausible search term, with the brackets. Created following improper red link which has since been removed (see above). --Paul_012 (talk) 03:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Paul. In the absence of clear policy regarding needless parentheses, the only way a search term would likely need them is when they're already part of the title, such as (Just Like) Starting Over. While researching this, I found a similar situation to this discussion exists with the bot-generated (J D) (with space—not (JD)) which also goes to a specific term rather than the Dab. Fun fact, the bot actually created (J D ) originally. StonyBrook babble 18:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Paul 012's findings above. Currently not used and not likely to be useful. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bird app[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 7#Bird app

Theory of Physic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Arguments for deletion are both more plentiful and stronger than the retarget proposals. signed, Rosguill talk 02:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot figure out why this redirect exists. The main results I get searching "Theory of Physic" are mostly for volumes of 18th-century lectures by Herman Boerhaave; it's also an easy typo of Theory of Physics (the lowercase version Theory of physics exists), but even if that were why it were created, why does it target Medicine? (I currently propose a retarget to Theoretical physics, the target of Theory of physics, as an {{R from misspelling}}.) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Physic is an archaic term for medicine. The redirect appears to have been created for a link which used to be in William Alison, where it says he was Professor of the Theory of Physic, Edinburgh University. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Retargeting to Physic would probably cover the intended usage best. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      ...you know, I completely forgot to look up Physic on its own. Huh. We don't have a Theory of medicine, and I don't see a great target for that or Theory of Physic (there is Medical theory, which targets Medical research, but the placement of theory there is important, I believe?), so... I have no clue what to do (I don't think Physic is a great target, since there's no entries that go over the theory of physic there). I think I'd say weak delete for now as no fitting target, unless someone finds one. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      I'm also fine with deleting. There's also Regius Professor of Physiology (Glasgow) which used to be known as "Regius Chair of Theory of Physic or Institutes of Medicine", but it's a partial title match and a different professorship from those of Herman Boerhaave and William Alison, so targeting there wouldn't be helpful. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Skarmory and Paul. Jay 💬 10:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget? Delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Duckmather (talk) 01:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Duckmather, I didn't put it in bold, but I mentioned above that I'm also fine with deleting. Since all participants in the discussion expressed at least partial agreement with that option, I don't think this needed to be relisted. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Paul 012: Thanks for the observation, but I thought that the retarget suggestion that you proposed (to Physic) deserved at least a closer look. In fact, I am right now proposing that we retarget this redirect to Theoretical physics, which seems to be the closest match for this oddly formatted term. Duckmather (talk) 03:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I would oppose retargeting to theoretical physics, given that the only non-misspelled uses of the term are historical uses referring to medicine. --Paul_012 (talk) 03:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_August_31&oldid=1174708436"