Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 23

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 23[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 23, 2022.

The Coalition[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 31#The Coalition

HM The King & HM The Queen[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 3#HM The King & HM The Queen

Made in Azerbaijan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Targetting to Economy of Azerbaijan#Manufacturing as a target better than the current one. Jay (talk) 17:20, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly mentioned in target. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 10:13, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Economy of Azerbaijan#Manufacturing: Targeting the country just in general doesn't provide useful information, but it is feasible that someone searching for this term would want to find something about the Manufacturing of Azerbaijan. TartarTorte 14:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

≬[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 9#≬

Template:Absatz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was rewrite as a "substitute only" translation template Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template name is written in German, I don't think this is necessary. Q28 (talk) 03:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created it explicitly because it was needed, by someone copying a German article to the English Wikipedia. It should probably be made into a subst-only template that is converted by a bot to {{clear}}, following the model of {{Kaynakça}} and {{각주}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 11:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It's actually in use and if it's useful for transwikying then there is no reason not to keep it. SpinningSpark 11:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace with a substitution only wrapper. I am going to take Jonesey95's word that this is useful for translating articles and should be kept in some form, but I think this would work better as a wrapper template than a redirect. In my opinion templates on the English Wikipedia should use English language names that are recognisable to the majority of editors - if you were editing an article and came across {{Absatz}} I don't think it would be obvious what the template was. Having a bot replace them with english wikipedia equivalents seems like a good compromise. 192.76.8.94 (talk) 09:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or make into a substitution only wrapper. At no point should a template with a non-English name or a template with non-English parameter names be used in pages. Editors shouldn't need to guess or investigate what a template does. Gonnym (talk) 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Plastikspork, would you be able to resolve this? I seem to recall you helping out with a similar situation in the past. -- Tavix (talk) 14:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Terry Pearce[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 3#Terry Pearce

Diphosphorus trisulfide[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 30#Diphosphorus trisulfide

Wikipedia:Hs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:High schools. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This nearly-unlinked-to shortcut should be re-targeted to Wikipedia:High schools to match Wikipedia:HS. NotReallySoroka (talk) 04:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WinPhone[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

R3-esque? I didn't want to tag it without input from others though Happy Editing--IAmChaos 02:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • @IAmChaos: were you really looking for input from others, or did you just want this deleted? Jay (talk) 10:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I was looking for input. Its been 7 days, so feel free to treat it as a PROD per the RfD norms. I didn't want to unilaterly declare it R3 though. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 15:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

AMD Athlon XP 3200+[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete the one with (tm).

Unnecessary redirect for a single model of CPU out of hundreds. This is the only one that has its own redirect. Zerranto (talk) 16:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I've added the other "(tm)" redirect which is being discussed by participants but was absent from this nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete (tm) per above, and keep the other one (I've tagged as IP suggested) Happy Editing--IAmChaos 02:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

St. Rose of Lima Parish in Chula Vista[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 30#St. Rose of Lima Parish in Chula Vista

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_May_23&oldid=1092358532"