Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 24[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 24, 2022.

Sze Kai-Kit[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Ponyo per criterion G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to A11/A7'd page (see deletion log). Iseult Δx parlez moi 19:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Yasmeen Fletcher[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 19:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-redirect from draft namespace into article namespace. The draft that was here was recently moved into article namespace, but the mover left behind a redirect.

I'm interpreting R2 speedy deletion as being applicable only if this were the other way around (a redirect from article namespace to draft namespace), so this is why I'm bringing it here. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:13, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This is no longer a draft, thus a redirect in draft space is misleading. It is true that redirects from draft space are normally left behind (see WP:RDRAFT), but the only rationale I have ever heard that makes sense for keeping these is that it is a bookmark for the author to find the draft if needed. However, the draft author has edited the page since the move, so they know where it is. -- Tavix (talk) 16:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, I think IAmChaos is right. Taking this to its logical conclusion would be a big waste of admin time for not much benefit. -- Tavix (talk) 19:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:RDRAFT. To delete all draftspace redirects would be an unimaginable waste of community/administrator time (so many pages). To litigate the existence of WP:RDRAFT, there should be another VPR proposal like the original one where consensus was found against deletion. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:02, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Bangladeshi film of 2022[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 1#List of Bangladeshi film of 2022

Street Design of Santa Margherita[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely redirect to empty section of dubious notability Fram (talk) 10:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The target is now Santa Margherita Ligure but this redirect is unnecessary: there's nothing special about its street design. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:33, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Border of Santa Margherita Ligure[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to empty section, useless Fram (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree, it has no purpose now and what I originally intended with it would've been overdetailed N1TH Music (talk) 18:37, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

93 FM[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 1#93 FM

2027 French presidential election[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The target has no mention of the 2027 election or the next election. Delete, or retarget to an article that is helpful to the reader. See the articles from where the redirect is linked: European Council and List of members of the European Council. All future dated title links there are of either articles, or redirects to articles that talk about the future elections. Jay (talk) 08:33, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

🫠[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 8#🫠

Family buisiness[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Editors are relatively evenly split between keep and delete signed, Rosguill talk 19:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo. Only received 910 views in the past 7 years, and not linked on any article. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:49, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, per nom. MB 00:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, even excluding the two day bump, that's a lot of views. This redirect seems to aid navigation (also note RHARMFUL). J947 † edits 00:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • There was an eight-day bump for mysterious reasons (maybe someone accidentally linked this on a live article?), and that yielded 775 views. Excluding this unusual anomaly, there have only been 135 views for the past seven years. "Buisiness" is hardly a common typo, it's not even on this list. InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • Serves me right for not investigating further. Of course, that doesn't invalidate my argument. J947 † edits 06:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 02:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Likely typo possibly, but I concur with the nom that it's also an uncommon one, and therefore not worth keeping. CycloneYoris talk! 02:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm gonna go with Keep I've seen redirects kept with more than the 15 views that this had in the past year, and its not that implausible as a typo. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Joey's[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 1#Joey's

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_24&oldid=1096998258"