Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 15[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 15, 2022.

Primera Iglesia Baptista[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 23#Primera Iglesia Baptista

Ground of oneness[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 02:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this at the target, and I have no idea what this expression refers to. I recommend deletion. Veverve (talk) 22:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Far from having any specific target. Dear Debasish (talk) 14:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not sure how this is related to the target; no mention of any "ground of oneness" there either. 98.179.127.59 (talk) 17:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Google searches on this exact phrase almost all relate back to Witness Lee, as he authored a book with the title "The Genuine Ground of Oneness". As Lee was a significant figure in the The Local Church it's reasonable to assume that there is a connection between the phrase and the religious group, however as it is not mentioned in the article, nor is there any mention of the concept or book in Lee's article (which would otherwise be a good target) or anywhere else on Wikipedia, we have nothing to offer anyone looking for information about it. Thryduulf (talk) 14:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Church Assembly Hall[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 23#Church Assembly Hall

Church in[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 02:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The expression is abstruse, I have no idea what this is supposed to refer to and the information at the target does not help. In any case, the expression itself ("church in") is too vague to be useful for anything.
I recommend deletion. Veverve (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This search term is hopelessly vague. Thryduulf (talk) 22:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Far from having any specific target. Dear Debasish (talk) 14:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Frankly, the title of the redirect itself makes zero sense to me. Even though "church in" is mentioned at the target, it's far from being an appropriate place to redirect it to. 98.179.127.59 (talk) 16:34, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ground of locality[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 23#Ground of locality

Slovakia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Slovakia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013

Draft:1200 (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Core concern was a technical issue that I've fixed. As I did not express any view on the merits of this nomination, my reading of WP:NACD is that it's acceptable for me to close. (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 11:43, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from draft space to mainspace, shouldn't exist Dan Bloch (talk) 16:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Redirect talk p[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused (currently), implausible, and confusing with {{Redirect talk}}. Qwerfjkltalk 12:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Deutsches Medizinhistorisches Museum[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of medical museums#Deutsches Medizinhistorisches Museum. signed, Rosguill talk 21:38, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of @Mateus2019, who nominated the page for speedy deletion with the following rationale: simply wrong, it's located in another city and has nothing to do with this one. Qwerfjkltalk 10:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget Found a list in which it is an entry (List of medical museums#Deutsches Medizinhistorisches Museum), updated the redirect accordingly. Paradoctor (talk) 11:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I've reverted that retargeting per the header at RfD, which asks not to retarget redirects that are subject to ongoing discussions. Otherwise it gets confusing what someone means if they say "keep". This is without comment on the merits of the proposed retarget. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 22:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry about that, got tripped up by feel free to edit below here. Paradoctor (talk) 23:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Paradoctor: Hmm. Good point. I might change the wording there. (I'll just have to update my bot first, since it relies on that exact line.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 21:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tamzin: Just in case you haven't seen it yet: special:diff/1065718098. ;) Paradoctor (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 12:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

X:RA[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible/ambiguous search term; not linked anywhere. Qwerfjkltalk 10:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Baby reading[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 22#Baby reading

Pure radio[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Pure (disambiguation)#Companies and products. Pure (radio) can be targeted similarly if it becomes a redirect due to Talk:Pure (radio) § Requested move 16 January 2022, assuming the RM doesn't hold otherwise (in which case it should be brought to its own RfD). (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 11:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pure (radio) is also an article. It probably should be at Pure (radio station). Bringing this redirect up for discussion to figure out if the target should be the radio manufacturer or the radio station. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 07:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Zones and woredas of the Amhara Region (template-redirects)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As unopposed deletion nomination. Jay (talk) 07:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These 23 template-redirects (batch #2) are left over after completing a month-long project to organize, simplify and update 167 outdated and disorganized templates (many old redirects, duplicates, and overlapping) into just 12 remaining templates. All 23 in this batch point to the same template, and have been double-checked to ensure there are no remaining articles using them. Removal of these old redirects will help to reduce any confusions as to which templates are to be used in articles, and simplify maintenance of named administrative divisions in a country (Ethiopia) which frequently renames, splits, and merges their zones and districts. Platonk (talk) 06:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

DC Washington[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#DC Washington

Carbon gas[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 23#Carbon gas

Isuzu Leopard[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 05:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The vehicle nameplate is likely non-existent, cannot be verified. Proposing a deletion. Andra Febrian (talk) 05:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I was unable to find anything about this existing (the closest I found was an Isuzu dealer/service network in Pakistan. It seems like this could have been created as some kind of translation error or similar due to the Leopard being a type of Panther? A7V2 (talk) 22:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Resurrection from the dead[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Resurrection from the dead

Hermy[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 22#Hermy

Jane Granger[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 05:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to the target article, Hermione's middle name is "Jean", but apparently there's been some confusion over Jane vs. Jean over the years, so I don't object to Hermione Jane Granger. However, I don't see any indication that Hermione is ever referred to by just her middle and last names, be that as "Jane" or as "Jean". (Jean Granger is a redlink.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom; implausible OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete extremely obscure HP trivia that no casual fan would care about or search for. Dronebogus (talk) 09:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. ― Qwerfjkltalk 10:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.