Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 27

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 27, 2021.

Westchester Borough, New York

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 4#Westchester Borough, New York

March oer Die

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another Eubot heavy metal redirect that isn't used much. Disband this unless a justification can be provided. Regards, SONIC678 23:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

President of the National Committee

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"National Committee" does not appear to unamibguously refer to the target, with many variations on "National Committee" in internal search results. While it's not clear how many of these groups have presidents, given the lack of prominence of the National Convention I think that deletion to allow for internal search results is the appropriate course of action. signed, Rosguill talk 22:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American egg noodles

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 13:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, I don't see any evidence that this is a an alternative name for the target. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 22:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

B.C. Strut

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The song isn't mentioned in any articles after SpongeBob SquarePants: The Yellow Album got redirected to the basis show's page. This redirect should be deleted. 2601:584:101:80B0:28DD:64BF:CE2B:83F9 (talk) 22:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Also, I found several more like this that used to redirect to the page, most of which I'll be adding here. Working on it...done. Regards, SONIC678 00:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC), edited 00:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Insieme informativo

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 13:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE. I can find no connection between this bit of game theory and the Italian language. Mass created with an unauthorised bot. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 21:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Battaglia dei sessi

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 13:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1) WP:RLOTE - I can find no connecton beteen this bit of game theory and the Italian language. 2) Even if there was a connection between "Battle of the sexes" and the Italian language that would justify an Italian language redirect there is no reason why this should target the article specifically on game theory, rather than Battle of the sexes. Mass created using an unauthorised bot. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 21:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gagnant-gagnant

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 13:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE. I can find no connection between win-win games and the French language. Mass created by a user using an unauthorised bot. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 21:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gioco di segnalazione

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 13:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE I can find no connection between signaling games and the Italian language. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 21:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Free encyclopedia

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Encyclopedia#Digital encyclopedias. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded redirect; redirects to a section that does not exist EthanGaming7640 (talk) 19:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pedro Goncalves

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Pedro Gonçalves. No prejudice against a subsequent RM. I see clear consensus that this should redirect to the version without the cedilla. --BDD (talk) 20:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It makes little sense to me that the name "Pedro Goncalves" redirects to a disambiguation, but Pedro Gonçalves with a cedilla goes to a specific person. Bear in mind that most English speakers will not have a cedilla on their keyboard, and once they have typed the unaccented c, the autosuggest will only show this redirect, not the footballer who is the result with an accented c. If this discussion goes the way of saying that the footballer is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this common Portuguese name, then really the next step should be to nominate moving him to Pedro Gonçalves (footballer) 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:7945:3621:8556:8CD4 (talk) 18:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vitrite (software)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target (or elsewhere), and without a mention there is nothing to be learned about the subject at the target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's actually confusing - if I go to Vitrite, and end up a page where it's not even mentioned. vitrite goes to a kind of glass, and the first page of Bing and Startpage doesn't come up with the software. It is the first listing under Google, but that looks like a paid slot, and it may be that Google is preempting me. I'm guessing that [[1]] is the actual software, but it hasn't been updated in 12 years. How did it even get in to wikipedia? peterl (talk) 22:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Zanjabil

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 5#Zanjabil

Flash Communications

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of mergers and acquisitions by Microsoft#Flash Communications (WP:NCRET). I have created the anchor. --BDD (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Not sure why this discussion was closed instead of being relisted, as I was suggesting that deletion would probably be the best outcome. CycloneYoris talk! 00:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC) [reply]

CycloneYoris, I think I was looking at an outdated version of the page when I closed the discussion and didn't see your comment. I've gone ahead and reopened the discussion accordingly. signed, Rosguill talk 01:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 04:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tigraan, an anchor can be placed for Flash Communications if need be. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

With Intent

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFD#D2 "might cause confusion", not mentioned at target. This is the result of a page move by User:J Bar on 29 July with the ec "Title changed before broadcast", fair enough, but nothing links here and it gets paltry hits as a redirect. We haven't With intent lowercase; offences so-named are described at Intention (criminal law) § With intent (an anchor I've just added). 85.67.32.244 (talk) 04:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brein Age series

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Old (circa 2006) implausible typo of Brain Age series (now at Brain Age), with 73 total pageviews since 2015. Note that Brein does not redirect to Brain. Pokechu22 (talk) 01:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

New York City station (Grand Central Terminal)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Utterly implausible search term, improperly formatted by any naming convention, recently created despite complete lack of need. oknazevad (talk) 01:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been going on a while: From mid-2019 we have Green Line (London), Yellow Line (London), Blue Line (London), Black Line (London) and no doubt others, even though no Londoner ever calls the London Underground lines by colour. Tourists and newcomers do, so they may be useful, but since Green Line Coaches primarily serve London, it doesn't make for good disambiguation.85.67.32.244 (talk) 16:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The redirects to disambiguation pages for incomplete titles bothers me less. 125th Street station already redirects to the 125th Street dab page because some time back it was decided to merge station dab pages into broader dab pages covering names, as is the case for other topic areas as well. As for the colors where colors aren't typically used, you already note that those unfamiliar with proper names may use them, so keeping those are aiding readers unfamiliar with the topic find the right page. That's just reader friendly. That said, things like "The F" are useless and should be deleted. oknazevad (talk) 01:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree about the Tube lines, I mentioned them as inferred that often these redirects have been done without much thought or knowledge. For example, two Tube lines are coloured blue, the Victoria Line in light blue and the Piccadilly Line in dark blue. So I made the redirect into a disambiguation page. Actually Transport for London calls them "Corporate Light Blue" and "Corporate Blue" (q.v. Tube map § Line colours) and, as that section explains, they've changed over time. That's irrelevant of course if the Rs helps readers get what they want.
Redirecting a nonexistent US county (named for its county seat) only encourages the spread of misinformation, IMO. These are not rcatted with {{R from incorrect name}}, nor anything else. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 07:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Metal Harbor

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: No opinion at the moment, but I'm also adding the Commonwealth spelling counterpart to this discussion. Similar action might need to happen with that. Regards, SONIC678 18:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Metal Harbor is a name of one of the areas/levels in the Sonic Adventure 2. Indifferent on what to do here. One could probably figure out a way to add a sentence into the article so that the redirect is legit. But it wouldn't be much of a service to the reader, nor do I believe it's all that likely to be searched in the first place. Sergecross73 msg me 19:12, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Life as We don't Know It

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I find consensus to delete the similar redirects with irregular capitalization, and will delete them as well per WP:NOTBURO. I will leave Life as we do not know it to a separate discussion, if desired. --BDD (talk) 20:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:29, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I think this term is a valid {{R from related word}} or phrase for the target. The related redirects Life as we do not know it and Life, but not as we know it also target the alternative biochemistry article. But in this case, it seems this version with odd capitalization was created for an entry on the disambiguation page Life as We Know It, where it is linked contrary to MOS:DABONE. So delete this version, create the proper sentence-case version of this redirect if desired, and update the dab page as appropriate. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:39, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. In science fiction (and speculative discussions about alien biochemistry), "Life as we know it" refers to life similar to that found on Earth (carbon-based), whereas "Life as we don't know it" refers to life using alternate biochemistries. Googling "Life as we don't know it" reveals some pages discussing alternative forms of biochemistry. Also, see this - [2] Ae-a (talk)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, delete that one too as it still has improper capitalization. Redirects are generally not moved, as it recreates the original redirect anyway, and especially should not be done during an open RfD discussion, as it just makes things complicated and confusing. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wanasur

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 6#Wanasur

Muscular Arms

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. I am not adding the suggested hatnote, since I find it unlikely we'd ever bother creating a Muscular arms if this fictional place didn't exist, although if anyone feels strongly that we should have such a hatnote, I won't revert it. --BDD (talk) 20:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Briefly mentioned in target article as a minor plot point, but the primary topic here seems to be literal muscular arms. Hog Farm Talk 23:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose: As the creator of this redirect, I have a slight preference to keep the original target based on the capitalization of the word "Arms", which I feel would be an unusual inclusion in the search box if a reader were to search for an article about health, anatomy, or even bodybuilding. (For context, the redirect's title refers to a fictional apartment building named "Muscular Arms" inhabited by a trio of superheroes in the cartoon series Dexter's Laboratory.) That being said, I do understand the nominator's point of view. — Paper Luigi T • C 00:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_September_27&oldid=1048480562"