Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 17[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 17, 2021.

Aggin[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 22:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per UrbanDictionary, this, the soft-r N-word backwards, is meant as that word but for white people. Special:Search/~Aggin shows it mentioned in a few song titles. If any article discussed the term, rather than just mentioning it, it would be a valid redirect, but as stands, delete and let the search results show people the songs. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 22:29, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Workation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Vacation#Impact of digital communications. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:56, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, sources online suggest that this is not an alternative term for staycation (taking a vacation in your hometown or nearby), but rather refers to a different concept (working remotely from somewhere exotic). I'm not sure the second topic is quite notable, but even if it isn't I don't think readers are well-served by the existing redirect and would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 21:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sa element[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike the other four "element" redirects that previously targeted the page (see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 9#Sb element for discussion about Sb element and Sc element, also I recently retargeted Pb element to Lead and Pa element to Protactinium), these two don't seem to have better targets (there are no chemical elements with these symbols, and as discussed before, these are minor properties of Ozarkodinida that aren't explained in detail in the target). As such redirects, delete, disambiguate, or retarget them wherever appropriate unless justification can be provided. Regards, SONIC678 19:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Given that all of the other analogous redirects have been retargeted away from their use in the current target, if these particular redirects have no other appropriate targets, deletion is appropriate. (In my opinion, this nom and my comments are an example of where "other stuff exists" is valid.) Mdewman6 (talk) 00:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No useful information at target. --Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 11:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Canis species an subspecies[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 19:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo of an implausible search term. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looking at the page histories the redirect appears to have been a result of a page move as the first edit after page creation. No need to keep it as it was a mistake. The current redirect goes to a newer article with no record of the orginal article in the history. —  Jts1882 | talk  19:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chikoo Ki Mummy Durr Kei[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Fastily under R2. (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 20:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect should be deleted because the target page is a draft. Zarif1511 (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fuck the dealer[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 19:46, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the target page makes no mention of this phrase and I can find no reliable sources that record it as a recognised variation of Euchre. In fact, both online sources and books (novels) indicate that it's a name used for one or more drinking games. Bermicourt (talk) 18:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Looking that the target, the relationship between it and the redirect is unclear. ―Susmuffin Talk 20:29, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This appears to be an alternative version of Screw the Dealer, which targets Euchre#Variations. I agree most searchers would be seeking content on various drinking games, do delete unless someone can find content to retarget to in that context (nothing came up for me in a quick search). Mdewman6 (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Monika Krause-Fuchs (German sociologist)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 25#Monika Krause-Fuchs (German sociologist)

Shopping area[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 25#Shopping area

Stand-alone store[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. not quite clear what concept the redirect is supposed to cover Apparently originally redirected to a section that has since been removed, presumably due to a lack of references. Paul_012 (talk) 15:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. --Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 11:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as ambiguous—this could refer to a big-box store, an outlot at a shopping center, a convenience store at a gas station, etc. - Eureka Lott 22:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shopping parade[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 20:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Shopping parade seems to be a rather distinct concept, noted more for their historical and architectural aspects. Even if a redirect is desired, Shopping center (which is the wider overview article created last year when the topic was spilt) seems like a better target. I suggest deleting, though, to encourage article creation. Paul_012 (talk) 15:41, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:17, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. (Though if somebody is willing and able to write an article about shopping parades, that would be even better.) The two terms don't seem to mean the same thing at all. Where I'm from, a shopping parade is typically a row or two of shops, each accessed directly from the street/pavement, serving a neighbourhood. I can't find any evidence of "parade" being used synonymously with "mall" anywhere. — Smjg (talk) 09:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Camp Creek MarketPlace[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Restored stub article and send to AFD. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A stub which was created, PRODed, de-PRODed, then redirected, back in 2006. Not an appropriate redirect; not mentioned in target, and rightly so. Since the page existed as an article for only three months but as redirect for fifteen years, I think RfD is appropriate and restoring for AfD shouldn't be necessary. Paul_012 (talk) 15:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: No one would ever use this redirect to get to the target article. ―Susmuffin Talk 20:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore and send to AfD. I understand that this has existed as a redirect for a long time and the desire to avoid unnecessary bureaucracy, but I generally hate the idea of BLAR + RfD being a backdoor to AfD, and there was certainly some past controversy about whether this should be deleted or not. I fully agree that as a redirect this makes no sense, but the proper move after a dePROD is to take it to AfD. They will either see the stub is horribly out of date and/or fails GNG and delete, or it will inspire someone to update and improve the article. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Okay, if there are concerns I'll be happy to AfD. (To the closer: please don't relist this.) --Paul_012 (talk) 20:52, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Even Steven (song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7. ✗plicit 12:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mention on the target page or any other associated page that I can find, and a redirect without explanation is potentially confusing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I've WP:G7ed it as creator. We have no article about Cabaret '79, the album it's on. Narky Blert (talk) 11:46, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chaneil Kular[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kular has appeared in four series, with Black Narcissus being one of the lesser notable appearances of his. Kular is not yet notable enough to have a page (per WP:NACTOR) but this shouldn't mean a redirect to a television series exists, as it provides readers with no information about the actor. – DarkGlow • 10:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LTA:SGK[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LTA: is not a pseudo-namespace. WP:R#D6. Sun8908 Talk 07:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nibin-Nogrim[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 25#Nibin-Nogrim

Charlotte H. Johnson[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any reason this redirect should exist. The article about Curtis Guild Jr. where this redirects states that he married a woman with a different name. Toddst1 (talk) 02:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be in error. The (maiden) name of Guild's wife was in fact Charlotte Howe Johnson, not Charlotte Howe Crosby. This was apparently a misreading of the source (her father was Edward Crosby Johnson); other sources also confirm Johnson as her maiden name. That aside, I would question whether she satisfies WP:GNG, since mentions of her appear to be either genealogical or in connection to her husband. Magic♪piano 13:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Roku Netflix[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 29#Roku Netflix

Stereotypes of Mongoloids[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 17:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Slur is not mentioned on the target page. Also offensive. Geschichte (talk) 21:24, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding pageviews, this was created 18 June 2007—by a user with a history of disruption in this area. It has 88, not 8, views in 14 years (link), but that's still quite low. --BDD (talk) 21:46, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_September_17&oldid=1047100149"