Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 11

December 11[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 11, 2021.

Etymology of the Punjab, Pakistan, etc.[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 19#Etymology of the Punjab, Pakistan, etc.

Stephanie sarkis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 19:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie sarkis → Stephanie Moulton Sarkis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete This is an unused (12 views in a year) and unlikely capitalization error Redirect to "Stephanie Moulton Sarkis". Note, a "Stephanie Sarkis" redirect already exists.Wiki-psyc (talk) 16:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom NotReallySoroka (talk) (formerly DePlume) 21:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a harmless {{r from miscapitalization}}. We don't advise creating redirects like this, but since it's been here since 2012, it may have accumulated external links and deleting it is potentially harmful. - Eureka Lott 21:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is no reason to delete: this capitalisation is not unlikely. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - To rebut the "keep as harmless" rationale, I as: "Why is it harmless to retain an error, especially when it has been brought to our attention in this forum?" Let's not be beholden to a catchphrase as the sole rationale for keeping. We are editors of this encyclopedia, so let's Be bold and use our judgement to remove junk as appropriate. Senator2029 【talk】 21:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above; likely typo. Unhelpful to delete. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 07:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. While we don't encourage creation of such redirects, and this one gets few views every year, it's still a plausible miscapitalization, and there's the possible external links that Eureka brings up. Regards, SONIC678 22:14, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a standard {{R from miscapitalization}} to a proper noun. Such redirects are common. I have added this rcat. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:45, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per EurekaLott, Shhhnotsoloud, et al. Thryduulf (talk) 10:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's not an error. It just supports someone who's typing the title without capitals. 122.150.71.249 (talk) 18:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per other "keep" recommendations above, especially User:122.150.71.249. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Last Paradise (film)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 18#The Last Paradise (film)

First night[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to First Night (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 08:27, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First night → Premiere (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Most results for this term on GScholar are about first nights in psychiatric care or Prima nocta, in an internet search it's primarily events titled "First night" and miscellaneous results. I would lean towards deletion to allow for search results. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, or possibly convert to a dab page. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:53, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to First Night as a {{r from other capitalization}}. We have a disambiguation page at First Night (disambiguation), but everything on it is a proper name, so it doesn't look like a good target for the nominated term. - Eureka Lott 21:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to First Night (disambiguation); I have done this for now, because there are many uses of the phrase there; First Night is one specific event --Macrakis (talk) 19:53, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with hatnote to other uses. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to First Night (disambiguation) which I think provides links that our readers might want to read.--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as retargetted ti First Night (disambiguation). PamD 07:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 15:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to First Night (disambiguation) since there is some doubt about which article readers may be looking for with this capitalization. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

No waiting[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 19#No waiting

Biškek[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Thryduulf (talk) 17:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Biškek → Bishkek (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

~~Delete per WP:RFOREIGN~~ - there is no particular affinity between Estonian, Finnish or Slovak and Kyrgyzstan. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak delete~~ This does violate WP:RFOREIGN however, the Vatican-run AsiaNews does seem to refer to Bishkek as Biškek and I'm not sure as to why, but here are some examples: The two Žaparovs of Biškek, Europe and Central Asia meet in Biškek on economy, Biškek: A fatwa to boost vaccination against Covid. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 14:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Snood1205: I'm not sure how I missed that, but it's enough that no longer think this should be deleted and were it not for your !vote I would have withdrawn it. Thryduulf (talk) 10:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Thryduulf: I struck my !vote, so feel free to withdraw if you want. In retrospect, that should have been just a comment and not a weak delete. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 16:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 17:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gv[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to GV. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gv → Manx language (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Retarget to GV per WP:RDAB. They could refer to several terms called "GV". 2405:9800:BA31:F6:BC3F:ED78:C130:2209 (talk) 08:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to dab per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 12:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to dab, no primary topic Polyamorph (talk) 13:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to GV per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to GV per nom. Unlike Cl → Chlorine, it's so ambiguous to target to that article. 49.48.147.206 (talk) 07:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shimanamikaido[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 17#Shimanamikaido

Question Team[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question Team → Richard Ayoade (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Per "redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject", the Richard Ayoade article only mentions Question Team in a table row, where it says that it's the name of a television show that he hosted for 8 episodes in 2021. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 03:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:REDYES. There are a few pages that link to Question Team and they'd benefit from a red link, which would be more likely to be created into an actual article if appropriate. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 16:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Category:Unnumbered minor planets[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Category:Minor planet object articles (unnumbered). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unnumbered minor planets → Category:Minor planet object redirects (unnumbered) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Someone searching for this is probably more likely to be looking for Category:Minor planet object articles (unnumbered), since the current target contains minor planets that have since been assigned numbers. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This might be a good candidate for disambiguating via Template:Category disambiguation. - Eureka Lott 22:39, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per nom. Someone looking for a category without "redirects" in the name is probably not looking for a category containing only redirects. Thryduulf (talk) 12:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.