Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 4[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 4, 2020.

Banana slamma[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target article. Anyone looking for information about this apparent catchphrase (from CSD decline) will either already know where it's from, but fail to find more info – or not know where it's from, and be left confused why they were redirected here. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:06, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Olney, Alex (April 25, 2018). "Video: Donkey Kong Tropical Freeze's New Easter Egg is Only On Switch". Nintendo Life. The phrase 'banana slamma' was DK's catchphrase in the short-lived TV series.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Clap alien cheeks[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 22:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/clap-those-alien-cheeks How about this?
Thatstinkyguy (talk) 23:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Thatstinkyguy[reply]
If you can find a reliable source that would be appropriate to use to add a mention of the phrase to the article, I would withdraw this discussion. However, a redirect to that target without an explanation on the target page doesn't do our readers any good. signed, Rosguill talk 23:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep: phrase was used in meme culture, though hard to find sources to back this up. Harmless as no likely other destinaton possible. ◢   Ganbaruby!   (remember to ping!) 00:52, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a unmentioned and unlikely search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:59, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. An ephemeral meme, see Vanity Fair and Time (both WP:RS). No-one is likely to come across the phrase without its being used in a Storm Area 51 context, which tells readers where to look. This is WP:TRIVIA. Narky Blert (talk) 16:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - It's a minor aspect of a larger meme that, as stated above, really only functions as the barest bit of trivia. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The phrase has seen almost no use or search interest in the past 3 months. It's a tiny derivative meme that has no relevance for the topic today. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 18:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Clear {{R from meme}}. We have the sources, so I just went ahead and added a quick mention of this topic. @Rosguill: Pinging you even though it's too late to withdraw it. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 20:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dave Brown (rugby league) (version 2)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 04:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary and obviously unhelpful redirect. All major edit history present at this title is WP:CUTPASTE reverting, and thus unnecessary to retain for attribution. Steel1943 (talk) 22:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dave Brown (rugby league 2)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 04:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is unclear what "2" means. Unlikely and unhelpful search term. Steel1943 (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Hopelessly non-standard qualifier (unlike the normal "born 1940" one). Narky Blert (talk) 00:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dave Brown*[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 04:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely, unhelpful search term due to the asterisk at the end. Steel1943 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Venezuelanx[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline R3 case, this uses the English word "Venezuelan" and appends an -x to it. I wasn't able to find any usage of the term online. The correct Spanish form would be Venezolanx signed, Rosguill talk 21:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. What an odd one... –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 21:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I agree. As stated above, this term appears to be used by nobody. Deletion is totally the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deletx. Zerx Googlx resultx – extremely implausible search term. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per all of the above. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Northern Territory v Arnhem Land Aboriginal Land Trust[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep , withdrawing per Narky Blert's keep rationale. signed, Rosguill talk 18:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While this does appear to be a related topic, it is currently not mentioned at all in the target article. I'm leaning toward deletion to encourage article creation, but am open to keeping if a sourced mention could be added. It's also possible that Arnhem Land may be a better target. signed, Rosguill talk 21:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elerondo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 04:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, searching for this name on the internet brings up most non-RS usage. Delete. Hog Farm (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hog Farm: I don't have HoME with me at the moment, but checking online seems to show that this particular Quenya name is a back-formation and not from Tolkien himself (it's isolated from Elerondiel "daughter of Elrond", which is claimed to appear somewhere in The Peoples of Middle-Earth). As such, I'm OK with deletion (having created the redirect myself, along with some other alternative-name redirects for Tolkien characters in the past). If we do find this in Tolkien's writings rather than fan extrapolation from his materials, we may of course restore it very easily. Double sharp (talk) 21:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - There's no particular reason to keep this. As stated above, this appears to be an exploration of Tolkien's work rather than anything directly created by him. I agree. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ção[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of the pages linked at the target use this spelling. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 21:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. What is decisive for me is that searching for "Ção" in Portuguese WP (the two characters with diacritics are characteristic) returned the result "Resultados da pesquisa - Pode criar a página com o título "Ção", mas verifique se há alguma página sobre esse assunto com outro nome nos seguintes resultados da busca (caso existam)". There were no WP:PTMs; and even if you don't read Portuguese, you should get the drift. This could well be WP:MADEUP. Narky Blert (talk) 00:31, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:PTM (Ção vs. São). --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 09:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Soumya-8974: Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Partial title matches is not relevant here, it's about whether to include partial title matches on a disambiguation page. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Zshare[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned. 176.224.213.120 (talk) 20:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Given how widely mentioned this service is, I expected to see it mentioned in 'comparison of file hosting services' but didn't see it there. Maybe that related page needs expansion? CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:12, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bundle Zshare.net into this nomination; same target. Narky Blert (talk) 00:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation if justified. Not mentioned in target; the most detailed mention in WP I can find is in Internet Watch Foundation, "A 2009 study by researcher Richard Clayton at the University of Cambridge found that about a quarter of them were specific pages on otherwise legitimate free file hosting services, among them RapidShare, Megaupload, SendSpace and Zshare.". A retarget to that would be useless. Narky Blert (talk) 00:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Julias caesar[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect with an incorrect capitalization. Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 09:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is a typo as well: Julias. Glades12 (talk) 10:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Two errors, of which the typo is worse. Narky Blert (talk) 11:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This redirect is completely justifiable, as the typo can be considered likely, and the lack of capitalization does not make the redirect a negative utility. Utopes (talk / cont) 15:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep per Utopes again (was Speedy delete per redirect creator SMcC below). The lack of capitalization isn't a problem; many people type without using the shift key; this is a commonly misspelled name, I think, so that variant spelling is plausible. Doug Mehus T·C 16:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep, 134 pageviews last year so it's not a ridiculous typo. [1]. Hog Farm (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Harmless at least, and maybe occasionally helpful. Station1 (talk) 07:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as an implausible typo. We don't keep two-error redirects, as far as I can recall.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  09:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is a one-error redirect for somebody who only types in lower case letters, and is a completely plausible redirect for the name "julius" by spelling it "julias". Utopes (talk / cont) 00:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Which means it's a two-typo error just as I said, since typing "Julias Caesar" without capitals produces the "caesar" typo. I think all modern OSes have a quick and easy means of "holding" shift without physically holding it (by triple tapping it, or whatever) in the OS's accessibility settings. When I broke my wrist in 2018 I was doing this for a while myself in both Windows and macOS, though I've already forgotten the exact mechanics now. The one-handed and others using such a feature are already entirely used to have having to employ it on this site, since most of our articles with a mid-title capital letter do not have a redir with that letter in lowercase, and you can't really edit the content without using mixed case. So, we probably do not need to give a "free pass" for capitalization errors as if non-errors when thinking of redir utility, and we've pretty often deleted such two-error redirs before. "Julius caesar" and "Julias Caesar" are each plausible typos but "Julias caesar" isn't by our usual reckoning. If we want to change the reckoning to say capitalization errors don't qualify as errors, we should codify it somewhere and do it consistently.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  08:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • Perhaps, but why do we need to expect that everybody capitalizes their proper nouns in the search box when most users already know that the software automatically corrects the capitalization for them. I would consider a typo to be a spelling mistake on the fault of the searcher, but not capitalizing "caesar" is not necessarily the searcher's "fault". I would agree that "JUlias Caesar" should be deleted, as the capital "U" is a typo and therefore not plausible. "JuLiaS Caesar" is far worse. However, in this instance where the subject is two words, the second word was left uncapitalized, and the user made an honest typo with "Julias". If you strictly consider the fact that the redirect has two differences from the actual page title, then I can see why you would say delete here, as there are two or more errors. I personally don't judge the lack of capitalization to be a typo, which is why I say keep, but that's just me. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:29, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Either the spelling error or the capitalization error is plausible, but both not so much; the page views almost certainly resulted from the fact that the redirect pops up when you start to type it with the wrong spelling. The correct capitalization pops up if you start to type it this way, so this rather improbable redirect seems unnecessary. P Aculeius (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per RHARMFUL; the pageviews indicate a pass of K5 as well. No reason to delete. J947 (c), at 22:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Glades12. St3095 (?) 10:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment (additional to my earlier !vote): potentially ambiguous with DAB page Julia Caesar. Narky Blert (talk) 17:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Julias is definitely a plausible misspelling of Julius, and I'm not terribly bothered by the lower caps, but as Narky Blert has just pointed out the redirect is at least as plausible as a misspelling for Julia Caesar, which makes it a clear instance of WP:XY. – Uanfala (talk) 14:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I'm not sure if we can say as a general rule that more than one typo makes a redirect unhelpful. However, I also agree that this is a case of WP:XY, as stated above. Given that, deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:14, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How many typos in "Julius Ceasar"? None, one or two? 85.238.91.68 (talk) 08:39, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
One, "Ceaser". However, such typo is plausible. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 09:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super Bowl LIX[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 12#Super Bowl LIX

Arco (dismabiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 03:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelled qualifiers. The misspelling may look harmless, but it isn't: if redirects like this are linked, User:DPL bot reports them in Disambiguation pages with links for overworked DABfixers to deal with. Narky Blert (talk) 16:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC) Delete. Narky Blert (talk) 16:40, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Реддит[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 03:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subject has no unique affiliation with Serbian, delete per WP:RFFL. Hog Farm (talk) 14:42, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Parqet (disambiguation)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 12#Parqet (disambiguation)

Page (disambugation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 03:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UNNATURAL misspelling of Disambiguation. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 05:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. I was totally thrown that this was about the misspelling "disambuguation", because of the page moves. 85.238.91.68 (talk) 09:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, sorry. I shuffled things around a bit there before the nomination since that one was pretty old (I like to save page histories where possible). I theoretically could've had that one Nazrana (typo whatever) deleted per WP:PMRC#3, but I didn't want to abuse my user right. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 15:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Narky Blert: You're not alone buddy. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 15:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. No reason to believe this typo is even common among those searching for the terms. BD2412 T 12:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - Two errors. Dropping the "i" and moving the "u". Not plausible. Hog Farm (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all obvious errors. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:59, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1.000[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 14#1.000

Hiroji Kiyotake[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Restore article since this resolution meets the WP:REDLINK concern presented by the nominator. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 23:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:REDLINK. There are numerous non-Wario articles linking to this guy, and there's no special reason I can see why this should point directly to here. For instance, he's linked as a co-creator of Metroid in that article's infobox. Nohomersryan (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Reino Unido[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 11#Reino Unido

Wolfe Sr.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wolfe (surname). (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 05:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if Mr. Wolfeschlegelsteinhausenbergerdorff Sr. was known as Wolfe Sr., but Robert M. Wolfe, Herman L. Wolfe Sr., and probably others, certainly have. – Uanfala (talk) 14:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: Would this also be a case of WP:PARTIALDAB, too? It seems odd disambiguate these surnames. I don't have a lot of expertise in this area, so will have to refer to you and Narky here. Doug Mehus T·C 15:25, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I guess so. In that case the standard practice of redirecting to what is in essence a dab page at Wolfe (surname) might seem like a good idea, but I wouldn't recommend it as the list there doesn't contain information about whether any the Wolfes in question had the Sr. suffix or not (related questions being whether it would be appropriate to include that information in the first place, and whether we should encourage readers to search using such terms). – Uanfala (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 02:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Wolfe (surname). The "Sr." clearly makes this a surname reference. BD2412 T 12:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per BD2412. Hog Farm (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget - I agree. This is an open and shut case for going to 'Wolfe (surname)'. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If retargeted there, the surname index will need to be expanded: of the three people known as Wolfe Sr identified so far in this discussion (which are probably a small sample), it currently lists none. – Uanfala (talk) 15:21, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Howdy partner[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Howdy. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, and no connection to Italy that I'm aware of. Delete unless a good retarget point can be found. Hog Farm (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Maybe retarget back to Howdy as {{R from catchphrase}}, {{R from misspelling}}, {{R to related topic}}, and {{R to article without mention}} (correct spelling of the phrase is howdy pardner). Pageviews are support its utility and usefulness in terms of assessing WP:R#K5 or lack thereof per WP:R#D80. TROUT AvicBot for the bad retarget; there was no double-redirect. No prejudice if Hog Farm, as nom, wants to speedy retarget as part of the withdrawal of the nomination. Doug Mehus T·C 19:29, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment AvicBot has been trouted. Doug Mehus T·C 19:36, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This did redirect to "Howdy" for most of its existence until a bot "fixed" a double redirect to "Italy", presumably because someone made a bogus redirect from "howdy"->"Italy". (This is why bots shouldn't be fixing double redirects, or should at least wait to make sure it isn't a BS redirect). But it's a misleading redirect; nothing uses it, and on the off chance that someone is looking for information on this more specific phrase, they're not going to find anything at the "Howdy" article. Same goes for the alternate spelling redirect of "Howdy pardner", which should also be deleted. As a side note, {{R from catchphrase}} is wholly inappropriate, since the article doesn't mention that this is anyone's catchphrase. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Deacon Vorbis: Our rcat system is not specific enough; this is the problem. I took a broad view of the term "catch phrase," lumping it together with English slang phrases and idiomatic expressions. Doug Mehus T·C 19:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now without prejudice to recreation as a soft redirect to applicable Wiktionary entries if and when they are eventually created. Doug Mehus T·C 20:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not mentioned in the original target Howdy (nor is Howdy pardner, which IMO should also be deleted). This looks like WP:OR based on a memory of some or other line of movie or TV dialogue.
No prejudice against any attempts to resolve the four maintenance templates on Howdy, which have been there since November 2018. Narky Blert (talk) 22:52, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Howdy as the most common phrase associated with Howdy. Do a search on howdy, partner in the books section and you'll see it discussed many times. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Howdy per my comments above and AngusWOOF, who gets my thinking here. Doug Mehus T·C 15:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Howdy per AngusWOOF. This is one of those rare cases where I don't mind that the phrase isn't mentioned at the target article, because "howdy partner" and "howdy" are almost identical in meaning, and it's unlikely we'd ever have an article about the former. --BDD (talk) 16:27, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 01:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chapter named after Mary[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 11#Chapter named after Mary

Cleveland, Painesville and Ashtabula Railroad (1848-1868)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 11#Cleveland, Painesville and Ashtabula Railroad (1848-1868)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_4&oldid=945520574"