Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 9[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 9, 2020.

Samurai Vampire Bikers from Hell[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested deleation as this redirect goes to the director of this film's WP page where there is no additional information about the film Chinanski (talk) 22:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1934 United Airlines Boeing 246 crash[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G6 and G7. Thryduulf (talk) 19:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a redirect under an erroneous title created by my error during a page move and is not needed. The page has been correctly moved to 1934 United Airlines Boeing 247 crash. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Diminish[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 16#Diminish

Paycheck to paycheck[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 16#Paycheck to paycheck

Thinking cap[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wiktionary:thinking cap. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 16:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend deletion unless a better target can be found. The target article no longer claims the term as a synonym and a WP:BEFORE search failed to find any evidence of such. SpinningSpark 14:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Soft redirect to Wiktionary wikt:thinking cap. All I can find on Wikipedia is partial title matches like Thinking Cap Quiz Bowl, partial title matches for synonyms (Six Thinking Hats) and specific examples of thinking caps/people who use them (e.g. Thinker (DC Comics)) but nothing that would even make it on to a disambiguation page. It's clearly a useful search term though, especially for non-native speakers encountering specific examples. Thryduulf (talk) 15:33, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft redirect per Thryduulf. signed, Rosguill talk 23:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft redirect as above. -2pou (talk) 16:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Thinking Cap[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 25#Thinking Cap

Kalaalisut[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 16#Kalaalisut

Western Greenlandic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Kalaallisut Thryduulf (talk) 11:41, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Kalaallisut. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Grønlandsk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Greenlandic language. Thryduulf (talk) 11:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Greenlandic language. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per nom; Grønlandsk is in the |altname= field of the infobox. Narky Blert (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom as the Danish word for Greenlandic. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 06:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

German, Standard[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Standard German. No need for a discussion here, just be bold. (non-admin closure) — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 06:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Standard German. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Irish gael[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gaels. Thryduulf (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Gaels. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:14, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Merged two nominations with the only difference being capitalisation. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget both per nom. A Gael is a person; the languages are always Gaelic. Narky Blert (talk) 13:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spanyol[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian word for Spanish. WP:RFFL. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spanyol nyelv[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian word for Spanish language. WP:RFFL. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Španjolski jezik[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Serbo-Croatian word for Spanish language. WP:RFFL. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Španjolski[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Serbo-Croatian word for Spanish. WP:RFFL. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

İspanyolca dil[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish word for Spanish language. WP:RFFL. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

İspanyol[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish word for Spanish. WP:RFFL. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:09, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Espa'ol[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 21#Espa'ol

Franska[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scandinavian word for French. WP:RFFL. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

French gaelic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no French analogue of Scottish Gaelic. Perhaps it means Gaulish language. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete almost all uses I can find are about translating between Gaelic and French, Gaelic-medium French language course(s), Gaelic football in France or something related to roof tiles that I can't figure out. My first thought was a misspelling/misunderstanding of Gallic or meaning the Breton language but I haven't found anything related to them or to the nom's suggestion of Gaulish language. Thryduulf (talk) 14:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Bizarre redirect, there is no such thing as French Gaelic. Jeppiz (talk) 17:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

French l[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

French I is always pronounced /i/ in IPA. Therefore, useless redirect. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 11:59, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

France language[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Languages of France. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous. Could also means Occitan, Norman, or other languages spoken in France. Therefore, retarget to Languages of France. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 11:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

E384[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to E number. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, and could also refer to an E number. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to E number, which identifies E384 as isopropyl citrate (redlinked). Tag as {{R with possibilities}}, which would make the circular redirect in E number permissible (rather than wildly misleading, as it currently is). Narky Blert (talk) 12:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget as well, because right now it is more useful pointing to E number (given that an E number assignment to isopropyl citrate actually exists) than to E series of preferred numbers. If the E384 series for resistors will be officially introduced in the future, this can still be changed into a disambiguation page again. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 13:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Narky Blert and Matthiaspaul. Thryduulf (talk) 14:15, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Moscow Academy for Tourism, Hotel and Catering Business" (under the goverment of Moscow)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Thryduulf (talk) 11:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete" due to the quotation mark (also contains a misspelling). 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Two errors is too many. Narky Blert (talk) 12:05, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete" this thing," while the misspelling of "government"" is plausible," the single quotation mark without the quote's beginning makes it a questionably plausible search term." I don't see how someone would search such a general topic without need for this stylization like that." Regards," SONIC678" 22:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is just useless to nominate. But it is a rather interesting redirect. It was created incorrectly by a bot in an unusual run of creations (see here). — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 05:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 18:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pixel (smartphone)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Google Pixel. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest retargeting to Google Pixel as title implies a more general topic. FYI this was created from a page move, most of the links from mainspace were transcluded from a couple of navigation templates, which I have since fixed. The remaining links are probably split, but some are clearly intended to refer to Google Pixel, such as Google Lens - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hurricane Henriette (2001)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Since I agree with all of the keep voters. I guess this redirect is not as implausible as I thought. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

I still don't understand why this redirect was created if there is absolutely no trace of any hurricane named "Henriette" on the 2001 Pacific hurricane season article. I strongly support deletion since there's no reason for this redirect to exist and it was obviously created in error. CycloneYoris talk! 06:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; no such named storm. Hurricane Henriette exists as a disambiguation page for anyone who needs it, implausible that anyone would be searching with (2001) disambiguation. wjematherplease leave a message... 09:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, possibly speedily given how soon the previous discussion ended. Hurricane is a very plausible misnomer for tropical storms. Redirects don't have to be technically accurate so long as they are not misleading or confusing, and I don't think someone using this redirect would be confused or disappointed where they end up. This particular storm was "strong" for a tropical storm, and it was closely related to and interacted with Hurricane Gil. For usage outside of Wikipedia, here is one example. -- Tavix (talk) 17:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • But that was exactly how I discovered this, I looked it up on the search bar and was disappointed when I found out it was only a tropical storm; that’s the reason why I feel so motivated for nominating this redirect. Though I agree the storm did merge with Hurricane Gil and it is sort of plausible because of that. CycloneYoris talk! 20:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • However, because of this redirect you were able to easily find out the proper status of the storm in question, which is a good reason for the redirect to exist. -- Tavix (talk) 21:36, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • I agree with you on that. Still, I think this redirect is kind of misleading and I want to prevent the occasional reader from any sort of confusion. CycloneYoris talk! 23:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • Confusion is unlikely given that the reader will be taken to a page that will educate them about the situation, something a redlink cannot do. Thryduulf (talk) 23:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Tavix. A very plausible misnomer, misunderstanding or misremembering so a very plausible search term. However correct the section target to "Tropical Storm Henriette". Thryduulf (talk) 17:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Tavix. A plausible title. Redirects are cheap. Natg 19 (talk) 19:05, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Hurricane Henriette. Keeping this redirect will be very confusing for many people. For the same caveat, we do not redirect Lorentz to Lorentz transformation. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. Redirects like this are cheap n harmless. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but amend to the correct subheading. We have many redirects from misspellings and misnomers. It is more helpful to send the reader to the place they are probably looking for than to refuse to serve the article until they learn the proper terminology. If a user has typed the 2001 disambiguator, or picked it from the drop down list, then they are looking for a storm in 2001, not the disambiguation page. I do think that users should be given better visibility that they are being redirected from a misspelling/misnomer, but that is a much wider problem to address. SpinningSpark 13:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Promised Land (album)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Promised Land (disambiguation)#Albums. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:29, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a plausible alternate title of this album. The name itself has been used multiple times in reference to the album's lead single, Living in the Promiseland, but never the album itself. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Eternal Jew (1934 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:58, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No indication that the 1934 film "The Wandering Jew" was ever called "The Eternal Jew" See RM at Talk:The Eternal Jew (1940 film) Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • If anyone is interested in making an article on the Yiddish film, the AFI catalog entry is here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. No practical or policy-based reason to delete, potentially breaking links we can never find. It's very flattering to think that a hypothetical reader will conclude that, because we have a redirect from this title to the article in question, we must know that the film was really made in 1934. But we're not a reliable source so every Wikipedian would know otherwise. (;-> And most readers will read the article not just the redirect title. Andrewa (talk) 06:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I believe the policy-based reason is #5 here, "The redirect makes no sense". It does not make sense to have a redirect to a completely different film. Natg 19 (talk) 01:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of 400-yard passing games in the National Football League[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Thryduulf (talk) 11:46, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It appears that the target list article was trimmed from a list of 400+ yard passing games to 500+ yard passing games. As of now, these redirects are just misleading and confusing. Natg 19 (talk) 01:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_July_9&oldid=969465222"