Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 2, 2020.

Template:Sco[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Placing an RfD tag on a redirect that points to a target that is likely to be deleted will just interfere with automatic deletion should the target be deleted. signed, Rosguill talk 01:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template redirect for a page in the process of being deleted. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Category:Admistrative Posts of East Timor[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary category redirect from a typo (left behind from when page moved but should have been deleted). No incoming links. Unlikely aid search. Senator2029 “Talk” 21:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse. --J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Effects of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico (old)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redirect with the "(old)" qualifier is not needed. No substantive history. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Triproton[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target, a cursory search at Google Scholar didn't seem to show any particular affinity between this term and lithium in particular (it seems that hydrogen and helium isotopes can also have three protons atoms can cluster in formations known as triproton, and most of the literature appears to focus on them). Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 19:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, though hydrogen and helium isotopes cannot have three protons. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, they're not isotopes, but rather some sort of cluster of atoms that is referred to as a unit. signed, Rosguill talk 19:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is another name for the (unbound, extremely unstable) isotope 3Li or the equivalent system in nuclear reactions. It has been called the triproton in several RS, and seeing as 3Li doesn't have its own article, the redirect is instead to isotopes of lithium. I'll see if I can add something so this becomes a true {{R to section}}. ComplexRational (talk) 20:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I should also note that the reports of this isotope (system) are not definite, but the name is still in use and unambiguous. ComplexRational (talk) 20:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, though a WP:RS or two would be useful. The name is clear and unambiguous: it can only refer to 3
    Li    , and is analogous to diproton for 2
    He    . Narky Blert (talk) 22:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Narky Blert: I wrote a short section on this isotope in the isotopes of lithium article, so the redirect should then be retargeted to this section. ComplexRational (talk) 02:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, since ComplexRational has written a section on this isotope at the target article. Double sharp (talk) 04:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

BEAUZ (DJ)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No objections to deleting an apparently inappropriate redirect. ~ mazca talk 12:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BEAUZ was mentioned at the target in a "Notable alumni" section. However, they shouldn't be included there unless we have an article about them, so we should delete this redirect signed, Rosguill talk 18:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Beauz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No objections to deleting an apparently inappropriate redirect. ~ mazca talk 12:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't appear to be a nickname for the subject. Delete unless a justification is provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rudlof Hitler[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, doesn't appear to be an alternative name. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Ruflof is not a German given name; and Rudolf (which is) and Adolf are distinct given names. A search turned up several misspellings of Rudolf Hess (most or all in English-language sources), at one time Hitler's deputy, but no examples of "Rudlof Hitler" other than this redirect. A search for "Rudolf Hitler" only turned up some non-RS unfunny material combining Hitler and Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. (FWIW, Hitler's father and half-brother both had the given name Alois.) Narky Blert (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment People in my locality frequently misspelled "Adolf Hitler" as "Rudlof Hitler". --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 04:47, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Useless. buidhe 09:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Valueless.Pincrete (talk) 12:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Rudolf and Rudloff are real names, and this isn't a correct spelling of either, let alone of the target's name. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 12:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 04:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

∑∏Τ∑R SΗΦΚΔRΦ[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zero pageviews for this redirect last year. Implausible redirect. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:49, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This is the English language WikiP. MarnetteD|Talk 16:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Astronomically unlikely search/link term. Looking up this on the web gave zero results besides Wikipedia itself. Glades12 (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete note however that this isn't FORRED but rather a nonsensical stylization using Greek letters based purely on visual similarity to Latin letters (transliterated literally this would redirect would be "SPSTR SNFKDRF" where R and the first S of the second word are actually just Latin letters). signed, Rosguill talk 19:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It appears the band used a similar stylization beginning with Common Dreads, but used the prescription symbol for the R's. Therefore, both of these are wrong (including the one I'm adding with this edit), and with the mixed scripts, I find it unlikely to be searched. -- Tavix (talk) 22:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, volunteering to add SNOW in Cyril per Tavix and Greek per Rosguill if necessary: –84.46.53.107 (talk) 12:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Creator delete. I was really into this band a decade ago when I made the redirects, and I was a dumb 13-year-old who barely knew how this site worked but thought I was being helpful. Sock (tock talk) 19:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kostolac culture[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 16:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kostolac and Vucedol Cultures are not the same, and as of now this page links to Vucedol. If I had the info I would just add Kostolac but I dont - speednat (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, Kostolac culture should be a seperate thing. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 10:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Keep and retarget to another article. I see no point in deletion. It seems to be linked to Coțofeni culture where it is mentioned, so perhaps changing the redirect to that article is more useful, or it may be redirected to Kostolac, adding a {{R with possibilities}} template indicating that it may be expanded into its own article. Hzh (talk) 21:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

МHC Spartak[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first letter of this redirect has been replaced by a Cyrillic letter. Redirects like this are considered to be implausible as per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes#Mixed-script redirects. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

СGA[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just like my previous nomination, this redirect also has its first letter from the Cyrillic Alphabet and is an implausible redirect so it should be deleted. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

АUF[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term as first letter is from the Cyrillic alphabet and the number of pageviews are only five for January to November 2019. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

YASD[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The term is not mentioned at the target page, making this redirect confusing for readers who don't already know what the term means. Not a very active user (talk) 12:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

YAAD[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 14#YAAD

Tiffany (South Korean singer)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 3#Tiffany (South Korean singer)

Nethack-el[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be the name of a non-notable NetHack variant which is not mentioned at the target page. Not a very active user (talk) 09:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of actual Parliamentary Secretaries of Canada[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary precision makes this a very unlikely search term. (note, there seem to be no Fictional Parliamentary Secretaries of Canada) UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Angel Munos[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unlikely misspelling of the founders name. (we already have Angel Munoz (CPL) redrecting here) UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Munos is a very common mispelling of Munoz.--Prisencolin (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since Angel Muñoz also exists, and is not a name disambiguation page, so thus this redirect is ambiguous as a misspelling. (If there was a name disambiguation page for "Angel Muñoz/Munoz", is recommend redirecting there.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:57, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Disambiguation pages[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all except for O disambiguation, which does not target a disambiguation page. -- Tavix (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation pages (discussion)[edit]

Unlikely search terms for disambiguation pages due to non-standard titles, more unlikely search terms for those with targets that are not disambiguation pages. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 25#Foo disambiguation -> Foo and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 10#Tiers disambiguation. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Originally posted in Special:Diff/933642506, overwritten in edit conflict, comment was regarding only O_disambiguation --DannyS712 (talk) 06:22, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose For anyone who cannot type the Ø character on their keyboard, it is a likely term, and as I've been told many times, redirects are cheap. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Anthony Appleyard: WP:R3 only applies to recently created redirects and there is an exception for page moves as well. Please be more careful in the future. -- Tavix (talk) 23:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Choccie[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Evidence presented that this is an accepted spelling. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear why readers looking up this term would be and should be redirected to its target article. Third party engines seems to state that this word is an alternative spelling of some word "chocy", which in itself seems some sort of unclear slang word. Steel1943 (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: User-edited dictionaries (wikt, [1]) agree that it's a slang term for chocolate. A couple of uses in more reliable sources: [2], [3]. Here's a linguist's view: [4]. In the absence of a rival destination, this redirect seems harmless and mildly useful. Certes (talk) 10:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm also seeing choccy and chocky ("If people place a nice chocky in their mouth, they don't want their cheeks pierced.") as alternate spellings. I don't know if there's a generally-accepted correct spelling - Eureka Lott 17:32, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 05:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kuknalim[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. – Uanfala (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 05:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_January_2&oldid=936056296"