Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 2

April 2

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 2, 2020.

Fracture (upcoming film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:19, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fracture (upcoming film) → Fractured (2019 film) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Another upcoming subject no longer upcoming. Steel1943 (talk) 22:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, also the title is incorrect. Regards, SONIC678 00:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as housekeeping. Hog Farm (talk) 02:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: there is no upcoming film film Fracture. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

.csc

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Internet top-level domains#csc. Participants were not able to figure out a good reason for the C# redirect, but a clear alternative exists as a top-level domain. ~ mazca ^talk 18:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

.csc → C Sharp (programming language) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at target. Also a TLD 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:14, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can not remember why I created it. The C# compiler is called csc.exe and there is a command in the Developer Command Prompt for Visual Studio called csc which is an alias for the beforementioned compiler. — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.Örvarr.S (talk • contribs) 22:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I suggest retargeting it to the list then. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The C# compiler and Visual Studio tool are called csc without the dot and the suffix for C# source files is .cs without the second c. ".csc" doesn't mean anything. JIP | Talk 22:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: In a subsequent comment 1234qwer1234qwer4 suggested retargeting this to a list, but it's not immediately obvious which list, and there has been no subsequent discussion of this proposal
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed target is List of Internet top-level domains. Peter James (talk) 14:06, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- When was that proposed here? – numbermaniac 04:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - The link from "TLD" and subsequent comment; I assume it's that list as the compiler is csc.exe, not .csc, and is not mentioned in the list of compilers. Peter James (talk) 12:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to List of Internet top-level domains#Brand top-level domains or an anchor. Don't see why not. --BDD (talk) 21:11, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to List of Internet top-level domains#Brand top-level domains seems to be the only use case _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to List of Internet top-level domains#csc per above (with anchor). — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 02:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Robert Cohen (acting theorist)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 10#Robert Cohen (acting theorist)

Joshua Singh

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Singh → Raju Singh#Personal life (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

inappropriate probably coi redirect for child of performer DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note should the kids names even be mentioned on the article?--69.157.252.96 (talk) 04:57, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If the article is deleted it should really be considered for salting, article has been repeatedly created and deleted. Greyjoy^talk 05:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is not "requests for deletion" (see WP:XfD). This is "redirects for discussion", where we discuss about redirects that may point to a wrong article. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 11:33, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 11:33, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'd want more useful information in the target article than an unsourced mention that he is a member of WP:NN band to justify a Keep !vote. Probably too soon to consider WP:SALTing (redirects can be salted, either to prevent recreation or to prevent retargetting) - the battle has only been running since 16 March. Narky Blert (talk) 14:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looks like a valid {{R from relative}}. If there really is a COI, that negates any concerns I might have about including him in his father's article. The attempts to create an article for Joshua reinforce my position, since this can help head off further attempts to do so. --BDD (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:59, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per BDD. If the information is reliably sourced, then in general there is no issue with the names of children in biographical articles, absent some other specific concern and I don't see any here - especially as Joshua appears to be attempting to become notable. Thryduulf (talk) 10:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and refine to anchor – so the redirect doesn't break – per Thryduulf. Note that the information at Raju Singh#Personal life is mostly unsourced, but right now it is the best we have to offer about Joshua Singh to the readership. Rcats should be {{R from relative}}, {{R to anchor}}, and {{R unprintworthy}}. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 21:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Recent votes are trending toward keep but numerically counts are even, relisting one more time in hopes of a clearer outcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a valid {{R from relative}}. I added WP:RS to Raju Singh#Personal life which support the fact that Joshua Singh is his son, which would seem to address most of the deletion concerns above. I don't see what WP:COI can exist from the mere existence of a redirect. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 07:30, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Molar specific heat capacity

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Molar specific heat capacity → Molar heat capacity (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I believe that this is a case of WP:XY for whether this title should target Molar heat capacity, Specific heat capacity, or neither. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The phrase makes no technical sense, and we should not have such a redirect. "Molar" means per unit substance (molar heat capacity unit: J·K⁻¹·mol⁻¹) and "specific" means per unit mass (specific heat capacity unit: J·K⁻¹·kg⁻¹), but both simultaneously (molar specific heat capacity unit: J·K⁻¹·kg⁻¹·mol⁻¹) do not occur in any context. —Quondum 01:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Planck molar heat capacity

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Planck molar heat capacity → Gas constant (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Planck molar specific heat capacity → Gas constant (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not covered at target page Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep They are all true, like Planck speed —-> speed of light, Planck action —-> reduced Planck constant, Planck angular momentum —-> reduced Planck constant, Planck impedance —-> impedance of free space, Planck permittivity —-> vacuum permittivity, Planck heat capacity —-> Boltzmann constant, etc. Ahri6279 (talk) 03:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I will note that these redirects were all recently created by you and cannot be used as a gauge of consensus. These redirects will be individually evaluated, as they don't appear to be mentioned on their target pages either. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not units that any working scientist actually uses and not things anyone would actually be searching for, even if it can technically be defined. XOR'easter (talk) 15:17, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – there is a whole slew of these "Planck" unit redirects that should go. Wikipedia should list unit names that actually exist in the real world, and not invent new names for their similarity to others. —Quondum 20:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Orders of magnitude (molar heat capacity)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orders of magnitude (molar heat capacity) → Molar heat capacity (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Concept is not covered at target page Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Having a redirect without a suitable target on WP is not helpful. It should redirect only to an article that provides the mentioned orders-of-magnitude list, and does not exist at the given target, and this is not a quantity that is likely to ever have one on WP (typical values for all chemical substances cover a relatively small range). —Quondum 01:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

School group

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

School group → Student society (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

University group → Student society (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Potentially ambiguous title. Could also refer to an unspecified group of schools or universities. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. University and school groups don't necessarily exclude non-student groups. --Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 20:38, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. School group is ambiguous with Eton Group and Rugby Group, and university group with Russell Group - which are specific groups of schools and universities respectively. Narky Blert (talk) 21:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - I agree. These are unhelpful due to the fundamental vagueness. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spankenburg

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 9#Spankenburg

Tayyiba Aneef

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per criterion G5 by Berean Hunter. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 22:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tayyiba Aneef → Tayyiba Haneef-Park (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Her name is never reported to be "Aneef", but "Haneef", I do not believe that this is a plausible typo. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

FBI and FBI: Most Wanted crossover

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Redirect became an article (non-admin closure) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:51, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FBI and FBI: Most Wanted crossover → FBI (TV series)#ep40 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not the name of the episode Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No longer a redirect. TheTVExpert (talk) 21:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lack or loss of sexual desire

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lack or loss of sexual desire → Hypoactive sexual desire disorder (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Sexual aversion and lack of sexual enjoyment → Sexual anhedonia (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Seems to be a case of WP:XY. For the case of the latter redirect, Sexual aversion targets Hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lack or loss of sexual desire" and "Sexual aversion and lack of sexual enjoyment" are categories of the ICD-10, the globally used standard in health care. They are coded F52.0 and F52.1, respectively. I created these while working on some other content, because I believed that their inclusion in the ICD-10 made them notably enough to at least have redirects. If they must be deleted, fine. Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As for this discrepancy:

(1) Sexual aversion and lack of sexual enjoyment → Sexual anhedonia

(2) Sexual aversion → Hypoactive sexual desire disorder

I went with the ICD-10 while creating redirect (1), because Sexual anhedonia is listed directly underneath the description (see here). If I understand the definitions given by the ICD-10 correctly, Hypoactive sexual desire disorder is a diminished or absent libido, while Sexual aversion and lack of sexual enjoyment is due to emotional problems ("fear or anxiety", according to the ICD-10) or if there is an inability to enjoy an orgasm. Weird structure, and I should note that the upcoming ICD-11 turns things around completely (see here). Anyway, both redirects could theoretically be correct. If they really need to match, I would change the target of (2) to Sexual anhedonia. You could also delete (1), that would resolve the mismatch as well. Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 19:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per rationale given by Manifestation. Seems reasonable. Guettarda (talk) 22:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm persuaded by the above arguments. Agreed. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:05, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Adult Video King

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adult Video King → Nude Maker (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Douglas Bowser

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas Bowser → Doug Bowser (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No indication that his full name is Douglas, delete unless evidence can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:55, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Created by an editor with a extensive history of creating redirects with expanded short given names without any justification, many of which have been listed and deleted at RFD. Narky Blert (talk) 19:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator as failing WP:V. I can find no WP:RS which mention his full name. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 01:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bush's folly

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bush's folly → War on terror (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

While this term has some usage , the usage isn't to this target. In [1], the Carnegie Endowment for World Peace uses this term to refer to a missile system in Alaska, while [2] The Atlantic uses the term to refer to the Iraq War. The Boston Globe also uses the term to refer to the Iraq War [3]. Not sure if retargeting or deletion is the best course of action here. Hog Farm (talk) 18:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I see deletion, whilst it might be in use its not a term I have ever seen except here. Not am I sure this is being used as an Adjective or a verb in some of these.Slatersteven (talk) 19:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The "Bush" here could refer to either George Bush Sr. or George W. Bush. As well, in terms of the latter person, this could refer to a wide variety of policies and platforms. The invasion of Iraq itself. The broader Iraq war. The economic policies of the administration that academics and laypeople alike blame (correctly, in my opinion, though many more deserve condemnation) for the Great Recession. The drastic expansion of the U.S. national debt. There's too much vagueness here. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2010–11 Serbian First League (Basktball)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2010–11 Serbian First League (Basktball) → 2010–11 Serbian First League (basketball) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

2010-11 Serbian First League (Basktball) → 2010–11 Serbian First League (basketball) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Double error in the qualifier: capital 'B' and a misspelling. Delete as housekeeping. Narky Blert (talk) 18:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bundle 2010-11 Serbian First League (Basktball) into this nomination. The difference is the type of hyphen. Narky Blert (talk) 19:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- ...And a bot will recreate the other if only one is deleted... Steel1943 (talk) 00:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - I agree. These just don't appear to be helpful at all. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

St. Mary's Rattlers men's basktball

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St. Mary's Rattlers men's basktball → St. Mary's Rattlers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Another little-played sport. St. Mary's Rattlers men's basketball exists, so delete this misspelling. Narky Blert (talk) 18:49, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Basketball is misspelled "basktball". This redirect appears to be created by mistake. As for that other redirect, I would lean towards keep, but wouldn't mind a delete. - Manifestation (talk) 10:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hải Ninh District

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hải Ninh District → Móng Cái (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target. One possibility could be redirecting to the dab page Hải Ninh, but it's not clear that any of the entries there would be known as Hải Ninh District, in which case deletion would be a preferable solution. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dan Price

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 10#Dan Price

Khalil Abdulkadir Farah Hersi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:37, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khalil Abdulkadir Farah Hersi → Yamyam (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

It appears the article was moved to the new title in January 2015 because the old one wasn't the real name of the poet known as Yamyam after all: the poet's real name is Abdulkadir Hersi Siyad. Khalil Abdulkadir Farah Hersi appears to be someone else, who was a government minister in 2003 (albeit according to a source I couldn't give here because it's on the Wikipedia blacklist, listing the members of Dahir Riyale's cabinet). Largoplazo (talk) 12:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, SONIC678 17:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

App£e

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

App£e → Criticism of Apple Inc. (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at target, but at Satiric misspelling#Currency signs (although unsourced). 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:07, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'd say this nickname could be listed on criticism for Apple and kept as a redirect from a non-neutral name, but this is only an idea and hasn't come to fruition. Still, "Criticism of Apple" seems like the logical target in this case for me, but the name is currently absent at the time of writing. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, SONIC678 17:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Until I see reliable sources using this term, it appears to be a bit of nonsense that I think we should simply be rid of. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bruce Wayne (Burtonverse)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Wayne (Burtonverse) → Bruce Wayne (1989 film series character) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Batman (Burtonverse) → Bruce Wayne (1989 film series character) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Labeling this iteration of Bruce Wayne / Batman as part of the "Burtonverse" is implausible and is special fan treatment for those who call this character as part of the "Burtonverse". It's also never mentioned at the target. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:34, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, SONIC678 17:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete partly because "Burtonverse" doesn't seem to be an established term on Wikipedia. There is no article titled Burtonverse, and searching for the term only returns a brief mention of it in one sentence at Alternative versions of Batman#Burton/Schumacher Film Series. There's no reference in that sentence to even verify that it is "generally referred to as Burtonverse". Agreed with nominator that this appears to be a fan-only term. – numbermaniac 08:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The "Burtonverse" is a concept that certainly exists and has been subject to interesting fan discussion. However, none of this appears to be encyclopedic. I'm inclined to support deletion as well. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Optical Society of Amerca

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 10#Optical Society of Amerca

2020– 21 Manchester United F.C. season

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020– 21 Manchester United F.C. season → Manchester United F.C. (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This redirect should be deleted as it is a remnant of an article that was created by an editor who has a track record (via use of sockpuppets) of fairly incompetent editing, resulting in it containing an extra space where none need exist (i.e. between the endash and the 21). I corrected the wrong title via a page move, leaving behind this pointless redirect. – Pee Jay 17:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. (Next time, ask at WP:RM#Uncontroversial technical requests - there's a way of making technical moves like this without leaving a redirect behind.) Narky Blert (talk) 18:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 13:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

N.b., This was listed as redirecting to 2020–21 Manchester United F.C. season, but that is itself a redirect to Manchester United F.C.. I've fixed the double redirect and tagged it accordingly. --13:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete. Whether it redirects to the season article or not, it's not printworthy. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 15:12, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - serves no purpose and is not needed. Giant Snowman 08:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

William Martin (Ameican football)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William Martin (Ameican football) → C. W. Martin (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
North Ameican Beaver → North American beaver (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These two redirects don't get very many pageviews compared to their targets (possibly because of the misspelling? I'm not sure someone would search "Ameican..."). Regards, SONIC678 17:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. Implausible misspellings. Jweiss11 (talk) 17:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Narky Blert (talk) 18:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was going to nominate these, but I was too lazy to go aheead. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rush Hudson III Limbaugh

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rush Hudson III Limbaugh → Rush Limbaugh (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Malformed, the correctly formatted Rush Hudson Limbaugh III exists. Hog Farm (talk) 15:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chris Canty (Arena Foorball League)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Canty (Arena Foorball League) → Chris Canty (defensive back) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Typo in the qualifier. Unnecessary clutter, when Chris Canty (Arena Football League) exists. Narky Blert (talk) 14:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Is a "foorball" a badly hit ball in golf? Steel1943 (talk) 15:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It can be a badly bowled ball in cricket when Yorkshireman Geoffrey Boycott is commentating. Narky Blert (talk) 16:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Hog Farm (talk) 15:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Hitpoint0213 (talk) 19:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Russel Sudzilovsky

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:26, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Russel Sudzilovsky → Nikolai Sudzilovsky (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Sudzilovsky used the pseudonym Nicholas Russel, but I don't see any evidence that he was known as "Russel Sudzilovsky". –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 11:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~. His Russian article, ru:Судзиловский, Николай Константинович, calls him Николас Руссель and Н. К. Судзиловский-Руссель, and says that he adopted the surname Руссель (Russel, Russell, Roussel) as a pseudonym; but there is no indication at all that he ever used Руссель as a given name. Narky Blert (talk) 11:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In Bulgaria he is known mostly as Русел Судзиловски and the editor before me has written his name after translating the article about Mihail Gerdzhikov from Bulgarian Wikipedia in the same way. Because of that I have made this redirect. Please look at Google books in Bulgarian. Also there are some hits in other languages on Google books. Jingiby (talk) 12:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (changing !vote) in view of Jingiby's arguments. Narky Blert (talk) 12:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Jingiby and the fact that there's the odd instance of forms like "Russel-Sudzilovsky" in English as well. – Uanfala (talk) 16:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SPanish-american war

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:26, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SPanish-american war → Spanish-American War (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Doubly miscapitalized; 2 pageviews in the last 90 days compared to 35 for the redirect below. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I just don't think that this is useful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:42, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Narky Blert (talk) 11:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my comment at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 31#The SImpsons. (It's a bit of an involved discussion chain, so it's probably best just to read that than to attempt to explain the whole rationale.) Steel1943 (talk) 15:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 2x errors. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Spanish-Amercan War

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:26, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Spanish-Amercan War → Spanish-American War (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Misspelled; only 35 pageviews in the last 90 days compared to 277,542 for the target. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's a somewhat plausible typo, but I honestly feel inclined to think that we should simply be rid of this. I don't see it as really that helpful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:55, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - 232 pageviews. Pageviews indicate that apparently this is something people search for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hog Farm (talk • contribs) 15:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- 232 pageviews in 365 days - not even one page view every day. I don't think Wikipedia should be catering to every single possible misspelling one can think of, and with 0.63 views per day this one is not popular at all. – numbermaniac 08:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unnecessary clutter. No-one on the planet is intentionally searching for articles relating to Amerca, not this deep into the title. Narky Blert (talk) 16:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the simple fact that during Wikipedia's almost 20-year existence, Amercan has never existed, essentially supporting this redirect being a rather unlikely typo. Steel1943 (talk) 17:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:50, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Future of Portuguese

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Future of Portuguese → Portuguese language#Future (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Ambiguous redirect per Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_8#Future_of_French. Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 08:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree. The general term 'Portuguese' can refer to a variety of entities from the specific language to certain types of cuisine to the hard-to-define ethnic subgroup and more. Given the vagueness, deletion is definitely the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:51, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Narky Blert (talk) 11:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete as vague --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Future of Portuguese language

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. In the future, Soumya-8974, if you want to nominate a redirect that you have created for deletion, you can nominate it for G7 speedy deletion _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Future of Portuguese language → Portuguese language#Future (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Ambiguous redirect per Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_8#Future_of_French. Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 08:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Don't forget the future tense of Portuguese language. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 11:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Narky Blert (talk) 11:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brian Brown (foorball coach)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Brown (foorball coach) → Brian Brown (football coach) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The pageviews suggest that this typo isn't fooling anyone. Housekeeping, delete. Narky Blert (talk) 07:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: obvious error. These sorts of things really should be WP:G6, shouldn't they? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 13:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - serves no purpose and is not needed. Giant Snowman 08:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Emotional punditry

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emotional punditry → Rush Limbaugh (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This term is not mentioned on the target article anywhere. A quick Google search for "emotional punditry" returns a few scattered news articles, but none of them link the term to Limbaugh. – numbermaniac 05:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm fairly certain pundits from all over the political spectrum can be considered creating "emotional punditry". --Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 07:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't think of any particular reason to keep this redirect. It can't point to any one specific person, naturally, and the general concept is rather meaningless, really. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If this means anything at all, it certainly isn't restricted to one individual. Narky Blert (talk) 11:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- No particularly affinity to Rush over other commentators. Hog Farm (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

X in in Y

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Columbia University apperances in in popular culture → Columbia University in popular culture (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
List of farm-to-market roads in in Trans-Pecos Texas → List of Farm to Market Roads in Trans-Pecos Texas (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Papua New Guinea cricket team in in Hong Kong in 2016–17 → Papua New Guinean cricket team in Hong Kong in 2016–17 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Sonatina in in D major, D 384 (Schubert) → Violin Sonatas, Op. 137 (Schubert)#No. 1 in D major, D 384 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Traffic circles in in Massachusetts → Rotaries in Massachusetts (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Digital terrestrial television in in the Republic of Ireland → Digital terrestrial television in the Republic of Ireland (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Papua New Guinea cricket team in in Hong Kong in 2016-17 → Papua New Guinean cricket team in Hong Kong in 2016–17 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Papua New Guinean cricket team in in Hong Kong in 2016 → Papua New Guinean cricket team in Hong Kong in 2016–17 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Papua New Guinean cricket team in in Hong Kong in 2016-17 → Papua New Guinean cricket team in Hong Kong in 2016–17 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Papua New Guinean cricket team in in Hong Kong in 2016–17 → Papua New Guinean cricket team in Hong Kong in 2016–17 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Papua New Guinea cricket team in in Hong Kong in 2016-17 → Papua New Guinean cricket team in Hong Kong in 2016–17 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Papua New Guinean cricket team in in Hong Kong in 2016 → Papua New Guinean cricket team in Hong Kong in 2016–17 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Papua New Guinean cricket team in in Hong Kong in 2016-17 → Papua New Guinean cricket team in Hong Kong in 2016–17 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Papua New Guinean cricket team in in Hong Kong in 2016–17 → Papua New Guinean cricket team in Hong Kong in 2016–17 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not sure someone would likely search for these things with "in" twice in this context. Regards, SONIC678 05:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Narky Blert (talk) 07:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - I expect that this will be a simple discussion. There's really no reason to keep any of these. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and add the following Closer's note: I've moved these additional redirects to the top of the discussion in order to be able to use XfD Closer. They were included at this location in the text for the duration of the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

which were other temporary resting places for one of the redirects mentioned above. Spike 'em (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. On it. Regards, SONIC678 14:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all all not needed needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Soccer at the 2008 Summer Olypmics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soccer at the 2008 Summer Olypmics → Football at the 2008 Summer Olympics (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
1988 Seoul Olypmics → 1988 Summer Olympics (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Beijing Olypmic Games Opening Ceremony → 2008 Summer Olympics opening ceremony (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This typo seems questionably (un)likely, although I can see someone transposing the M and P keys here. Regards, SONIC678 04:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot Beijing Olypmic Games Opening Ceremony. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 10:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unlikely typos, there are too many ways people can transpose letters to be worth giving all of them or any specific ones. Even if someone makes such a spelling mistake in search, the correct option will still turn up. Hzh (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. By the time a searcher has typed the first few letters, the correctly-spelled version appears in the searchbox. This is clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 06:41, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 13:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - serves no purpose and is not needed. Giant Snowman 08:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sparrow Feature Film 2010

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sparrow Feature Film 2010 → Sparrow (2010 film) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This format "[didn't] fit with [W]ikipedia standards" when the page was moved to its current title back in 2010. Maybe delete this... Regards, SONIC678 04:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A Google exact-match search turned up this redirect and nothing else. Narky Blert (talk) 07:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I strongly question the notion of whether people will type this in. It's quite unlike how one regularly searches about films on here and elsewhere online. Deletion is totally the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

True Form

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True Form → Armada Music#Artists (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Ambiguous term; not mentioned at the target. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 04:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not mentioned in the target. They're this group, even though that Discogs entry doesn't mention Armada. Ambiguous with, and seemingly no more notable than, at least True Form gym wear, True-Form boot company, Trueform engineering and True Form fitness. Narky Blert (talk) 07:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - To be honest, hearing the term "true form" makes me think more of anime ("You've defeated me! But now you shall witness my 'true form', you pathetic worm!" [smug evil noises]) and of mythology ("Surprise! You thought that you married a human women, but I'm actually a fox demoness!" [smug evil noises]) than music. All that aside, yes, I agree. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Armada Music Bundles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armada Music Bundles → Armada Music#Current sublabels (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in the target. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not mentioned in the target, therefore useless. Narky Blert (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

THNK

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

THNK → Armada Music#Current sublabels (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in the target. Has a listing on Discogs, but since the site falls under WP:UGC, the information on the page cannot be verified. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I keep seeing references to this group online when I do a bit of searching. Yet absolutely nothing appears to be a reliable source. This is actually more than a bit frustrating. Other than confirming that it exists and has been pumping out different tunes, there's very little real information out there. I guess that deletion is the only real option here. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 11:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not mentioned in the target, therefore useless. Narky Blert (talk) 19:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Armada BNL

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armada BNL → Armada Music#Current sublabels (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in the target. Has a listing on Discogs, but since the site falls under WP:UGC, the information on the page cannot be verified. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not mentioned in the target, therefore useless. Narky Blert (talk) 19:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.