Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 13, 2019.

Brono[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Broglio, Switzerland. Nom included, everyone agrees on this ATD. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 01:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A putative Norse god listed in some reference works but apparently an invention or a misunderstanding. The page redirected to once listed Brono but no longer does. Haukur (talk) 22:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

New California Republic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz talk 03:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this fictional element following this. Pinging @Drmies: who carried the edit. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 22:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, as it stands there is no warrant for this redirect. It is possible that it might point to some reasonable decent verified text in the main article, but none of that was there. Thanks FoxyGrampa, Drmies (talk) 23:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • You're welcome. RFDs take one week (seven days) so it takes a while for other people to decide whether or not to keep the redirect. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Geirrendour[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 29#Geirrendour

Case Farms[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 25#Case Farms

Imperial feminism[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 25#Imperial feminism

Wikipedia's notability policy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Notability in the English Wikipedia. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 20:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cross namespace redirect, which are generally frowned upon due to the potential for confusion. I'm bringing this here to get a broader consensus on whether this should be kept. Note that while this may be useful for new editors unfamiliar with the structure of Wikipedia, it also is strictly incorrect, as WP:N is a guideline, not a policy. As such I would lean toward this being inappropriate, although I would likely weakly support keeping Wikipedia's notability guideline or Wikipedia's notability rules. Note also that there is a related mainspace article, Notability in the English Wikipedia, which may be a better target, and as of right now I would support redirecting to there. signed, Rosguill talk 17:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Csw2014[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An internet suggestion suggests that this acronym is not in broad use, most results are about UN conventions or academic conferences. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete per below. -- /Alex/21 07:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bs2015[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Based on internet search results, this doesn't appear to have a particularly strong association with the current target. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect doesn't make sense to me either. David O. Johnson (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Bs2015" = "Blindspot 2015"? I dunno, but fully agree with a delete -- /Alex/21 06:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tailsko[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:51, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is, as far as I can tell, the name of a non-notable fan version of the character who is not (and definitely should not be) mentioned in the target article, and an implausible typo of the same non-notable fan-character. Both were created by the same user who has a habit of creating improper and trolling redirects. Neither are appropriate as redirects to the character page, and should be deleted.Rorshacma (talk) 16:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Thalapathi (2017 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mersal (film). I will also tag the redirect with {{R from former name}}. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atlee has not directed any film named Thalapathi. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • In that case, I would suggest adding a mention of this working title to the article on Mersal (though probably with another source than that news article, which doesn't state this very clearly) and retargeting the redirect to said article. Geolodus (talk) 16:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_September_13&oldid=918532564"