Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 31[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 31, 2019.

Darktable 2.5.0+481~g35ee32992[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. A justification was provided, withdrawing nomination. (non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 22:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an implausible search term. I would suggest deletion unless a justification is provided signed, Rosguill talk 22:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While some software projects do have major releases that are notable in and of themselves (which might have their own articles or subsections), this one didn't even get a tag in git nor was it mentioned on the Darktable website. The addition of "+481" and what seems like a hash makes it extra unlikely. Opencooper (talk) 23:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to Keep per new comments. Opencooper (talk) 22:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I created this redirect, based on a link at Commons file metadata. I believed it would be useful to get redirected to the main article if someone click on it. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 02:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In the future, please mention that in the edit summary or in a comment so other users will understand the purpose. Opencooper (talk) 22:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unidad de Valor Real[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While these concepts are similar, they are not equivalent: Unidad de Valor Real refers to a Colombian currency [1], whereas Unidade real de valor was Brazilian. signed, Rosguill talk 17:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As Rosguill says the Colombian «Unidad de Valor Real» is not related in any way with the Brazilian «Unidade real de valor». Olea (talk) 19:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2022 Major League Baseball All-Star Game[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect causes an issue at {{MLBAllStarGame}}: the other games that have not been announced are redlinked except for this one. If someone is wanting to find more information about the 2022 edition, they would not be able to find it at the target list since it is not listed. -- Tavix (talk) 17:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gamma Alpha Graduate Scientific Fraterntiy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moved years ago and if I had had the rights I would have moved without leaving redirect. Naraht (talk) 14:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment this was moved in November 2017 to Gamma Alpha Graduate Scientific Fraternity to correct a typo in the final word, and from there I think moved to the current target Gamma Alpha but the move logs seem incomplete or in the wrong place and the history of the correctly spelled version also seems odd to me. There may be other moves too as the edit history of the target goes back to 2006 but I can't believe the typo remained uncorrected for 11 years. I'd appreciate someone else taking a look at this to ensure we don't delete some necessary attribution. Thryduulf (talk) 14:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom as an implausible search term (we do not need a redirect for every possible typo). I shared Thryduulf's confusion, initially, until I realized that this page was created as a redirect, and the main article was, since the beginning, at the title Gamma Alpha. Therefore, the move history for this page is preserved here. -- Black Falcon (talk) 19:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It's a typo of a little-used name of the organization, hence not plausible enough as a search term. Deryck C. 13:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Funk-pop[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:14, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As discussion in previous statements, this is linking to something that doesn't expand on the music genre. There is no mention of funk-pop or funk pop in the article and it is WP:OR to suggest that this genre should link to this section of the article, or even this article at all. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Disco-pop[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. G4 would seem to apply too; it was recreated and speedily deleted last year. --BDD (talk) 20:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As discussion in November 2014, this is linking to something that doesn't expand on the music genre. There is no mention of disco-pop or disco pop in the article and it is WP:OR to suggest that this genre should link to this section of the article, or even this article at all. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:09, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jayden's Cubs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No reference to a character named "Jayden" at the target article. PC78 (talk) 11:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Heroes / Fables members[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Heroes (American TV series) and Fables (comics) are not related. PC78 (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

In His Own Image[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently this was the title of an unaired pilot that was re-edited as Genesis, but there is no mention of this in the target article. PC78 (talk) 11:51, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fahrenheit (TV series)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. See also discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 28#Fahrenheit (season 1). "Fahrenheit" does not appear to be an alternative title for Heroes (American TV series). Not mentioned at all in any of the target articles. PC78 (talk) 11:39, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of foo episodes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Heavy Rain and Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel are unrelated video games that don't appear to have any connection with Heroes (American TV series). PC78 (talk) 11:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

New Pittsburgh[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to New Pittsburg. -- Tavix (talk) 22:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target article and Google search draws a blank. Retarget to New Pittsburg though? PC78 (talk) 11:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Project Reborn members[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about this one; "Project Reborn" was the title of a Heroes Reborn episode, but it doesn't appear to be an in-universe group with "members". PC78 (talk) 11:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Heroes: Origins cast and crew members[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No such list exists; Heroes: Origins was cancelled before going into production. In any case the target article is for characters, not cast & crew. PC78 (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Non-Heroes characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:02, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsensical disambiguators. Dubious redirects created by a banned user ostensibly related to Heroes (American TV series), but in this case the characters are from unrelated properties. PC78 (talk) 10:35, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heroes characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 11:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Target articles are characters from Heroes (American TV series), but these names are not mentioned there or anywhere else. PC78 (talk) 10:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

🕵️[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 November 9#🕵️

Jeremy Quinto[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 11:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No such person mentioned in the target article or anywhere else. PC78 (talk) 10:26, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. There is no information in enwiki about the subject. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trade dispute[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 November 8#Trade dispute

Other Redskins sports teams[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 November 10#Other Redskins sports teams

Other hallucinogen use disorder[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 11:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Also, the redirect was an article for less than a day prior to being redirected. Steel1943 (talk) 06:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Razzcherry[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 11:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Section target is nonexistent at present. Steel1943 (talk) 06:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects containing wiki markup[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 13:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From a nomination statement I made in 2015:

"These redirects contain wiki markup, which has the potential to break the formatting of pages if linked in a page (such as bolding or italics issues.) Due to the technical issues caused by such titles, titles that contain at least two consecutive apostrophes are now restricted by the title creation blacklist. These redirects all have equivalents without wiki markup which lead to their proper targets; so, in effect, these redirects should be deleted. (Also, each of these redirects do not have any transclusions or histories that need to be kept.)"

--- Steel1943 (talk) 04:49, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, as technical cleanup. The redirects are not linked, no one is searching for them, and the move history is retained at the target pages. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Org. React.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retargetted to newly-created correct article. Thryduulf (talk) 11:06, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect. This is the ISO 4 abbreviation for the serial Organic Reactions (see website). This is not a generic abbreviation for organic reactions in general. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There should be one, although it was deleted in the past for being spammy. There's some more details here. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:31, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do you want to create the article on Organic Reactions or would you rather I did it? Abductive (reasoning) 04:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Abductive: if you want to create it, go right ahead. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Headbomb:.  Done -Abductive (reasoning) 20:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This can be now be closed as moot/withdrawn/whatever. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

14th Street Line (Washington)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 18:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 14th Street Line (Washington, D.C.) already exists and the "(Washington)" disambiguation is ambiguous. – Daybeers (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, as a recently created and ambiguous redirect with no significant incoming links. -- Black Falcon (talk) 03:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This has been around for over 12 years. What else might "14th Street Line (Washington)" refer to? Nothing at the disambiguation page 14th Street Line. There is no general requirement that qualifiers need to themselves be unambiguous; they only need to effectively disambiguate among topics with similar names. --BDD (talk) 19:02, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per BDD. Useful disambiguation bracket. Deryck C. 11:50, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 02:07, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per BDD and Deryck Chan. In the unlikely event a 14th Street Line is built in some other place called Washington and neither is primary topic, then this can simply point to 14th Street Line as a redirect from incomplete disambiguation. Until that time though it's a useful redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 07:08, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, don't see it as ambiguous. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.