Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 5[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 5, 2019.

Tottenham (NSW)railway station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very implausible typo, doesn't match any usual disambiguation conventions, and only a couple of incoming links. Triptothecottage (talk) 23:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:R from tpyo[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 16#Template:R from tpyo

Air-borne toy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:34, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not the only "air-born toy" there is. And what is an air-born toy, anyway? Toy airplanes?, things that you can throw in the air? I don't think we've got an article that discusses such types of toys generally (though I should admit I didn't look very hard). – Uanfala (talk) 21:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SnarXiv[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete with WP:REFUND available if it becomes mentioned somewhere. -- Tavix (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfD consensus to merge, but no longer mentioned at target. See this diff, where the merged content was removed almost immediately per WP:UNDUE. Note that no one at the AfD actually supported a merge, but not everyone agreed to the subject's worthiness of inclusion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:56, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vector (skin)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:29, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirect. No incoming links. Probably should be deleted. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • If this redirect is kept, please tag it with Template:R to project page. I am currently unsure on whether to keep or delete this; it seems both useful (for those who don't know about namespaces) and unuseful (because it misleads those who are actually searching for an encyclopedia article on the subject). Geolodus (talk) 18:25, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete users do not need to be spoon fed. If they know enough to look for this, they know enough of the 'net and wp to find it. - Nabla (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is not a target that users who do not know about namespaces particularly need to be able to easily find, and there is already a hatnote at the Vector disambiguation page to help them. I would have proposed retargetting to an encyclopaedic discussion of the skin, but I've not been able to find any (nor, for comparison, is there any about the Monobook skin). Thryduulf (talk) 15:34, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nathaniel Mary Quinn[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural close. ThatMontrealIP will be starting an article for the subject as they appear to meet notability guidelines. (non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 04:45, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not listed at the target. signed, Rosguill talk 17:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • 'Comment Looks to be clearly notable via WP:ARTIST 4)d, assuming the biography at his dealer's site pans out: "Collections include the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York (link); Brooklyn Museum, New York; Los Angeles County Museum of Art; Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles; Hammer Museum, Los Angeles; and Art Institute of Chicago." I'd be happy to write the article, but unsure about how to go about writing the article while this discussion is happening. I assume the redirect discussion has to be closed first?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I found three museum collections and a New Yorker profile, so notability is established. @Rosguill:, ping me when this redirect discussion is closed and I will move this draft to article space. Thanks!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eddie Martinez (painter)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 11:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful redirect, the target just has links to List of American artists before 1900 and List of American artists 1900 and after. Needless to say, Martinez is not included in those articles either. signed, Rosguill talk 17:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Internet+forum[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 12:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Created by @Sun Creator with description "From WP:TOPRED". The only place it's linked from is User:Rybec/failed-requests-mn which seems to just be a list of redlinks (which seems kinda odd), which also links to Internet+foru. The title is implausible, as it would only be encountered if manually editing the title while also using parameter encoding for spaces (which only happens with forms and not with normal URL encoding); this doesn't seem common and I'm not aware of other such redirects like that. Pokechu22 (talk) 03:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as an implausible search term. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 10:53, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The appearance on the WP:TOPRED list is ample evidence that this is a very plausible search term, indeed almost by definition we should have articles or redirects for every term on that list with a clear target. Thryduulf (talk) 17:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as misleading and implying there's something called an Internet Plus Forum. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is typo (the + and _ keys are right next to each other) that would get VERY WP:COSTLY if precedent were established. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible, and most likely relates to a search method that uses "+" instead of spaces. Steel1943 (talk) 00:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Abelone[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 25#Abelone

Relativity drive[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 22#Relativity drive

Suicidal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 21:38, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This page has redirected to Suicide and Suicide crisis. I would like community input on what is the best title to redirect it to. Interstellarity (talk) 11:44, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Thryduulf and BD2412: Anybody here? Interstellarity T 🌟 20:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think targeting it to Suicide is the most straightforward solution. bd2412 T 20:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I still think that the disambiguation page is the best thing we can target here for the reasons I outlined above. I disagree that the article is the best repository of links - that's something that (unsurprisingly) the dab page does much better. Thryduulf (talk) 21:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The disambiguation page is a WP:DABCONCEPT plus one band. bd2412 T 02:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 15:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep going to suicide as this is the best overview and main topic. The others are minor topics such as the band. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:59, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The base "suicidal" is a good {{R from adjective}}; lots of things could be called suicidal. For now, at least, the main article is also the best place for the "behavior" ones. Pointing them to Suicidal ideation is counterintuitive to me, since one is behavior and one is thoughts, though I guess they're not completely separate concepts. --BDD (talk) 18:30, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Melissa Petersen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep now that the sourcing has been sorted out and mentioned. -- Tavix (talk) 21:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not actually mentioned in the target. signed, Rosguill talk 19:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 02:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per andrybak. I've added a citation of her homepage along with her current name. --BDD (talk) 17:20, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mircea Hava[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. No longer a redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 14:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect no longer makes sense because he is now a MEP for Romania. Not much information in the linked article (city of which he used to be mayor), so redlink appropriate. Zerach (talk) 01:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

El Assico[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this redirect as it violates Wikipedia's policy on abusive or offensive redirects Carizona (talk) 06:20, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as creator. "El Assico" is a play on the "El Clásico" rivalry name that originates with an article from SB Nation. It has since been referenced by Every Day Should Be Saturday, Off Tackle Empire, Wide Right & Natty Lite, Black Heart Gold Pants, and elsewhere around the college football internet sphere. Notice that the last two blogs linked were Iowa State and Iowa blogs, respectively; the two teams constituting the rivalry. The name is not meant to be offensive and is not inherently so. It is simply a playful nickname that has caught on among certain fans (especially among fans of the teams involved), which makes it a useful redirect for this rivalry page. Ostealthy (talk) 06:49, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and mention (with those sources) in the target article. I don't know much about football, but nothing about this seems wrong and there seems to be sufficient references to it online. --Pokechu22 (talk) 01:04, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_5&oldid=1138582797"