Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 31[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 31, 2018.

Wikipedia:W[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 8#Wikipedia:W

Yasuhiro Matsumura[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (utc) 01:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reasonably prolific anime director, with no justification for redirecting to just one of his works. In the absence of an article the reader is better served by a redlink. Xezbeth (talk) 17:16, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom but don't create an article where it is just a list of works. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:51, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and maybe WP:REDLINK. Whether he's notable or non-notable, for a person who's worked on many things, search results are always better than a redirect to a single work. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 13:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C. Montgomery Burns Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (utc) 01:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Way too implausible. This search term is dubious enough as it is, but how many people are going to miss out the words "Award for", and ADD "C." at the start? Thegreatluigi (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rich creamery butter[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (utc) 01:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a particularly notable joke. Doesn't seem notable enough for a redirect, at any rate. Thegreatluigi (talk) 13:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Burns to Sell[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (utc) 01:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems rather implausible. Has only had 26 views in over 3 years. Thegreatluigi (talk) 13:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Phrase is not used in article. Looks like an obscure, trivial reference. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 14:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 06:34, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete as obscure synonym/trivia at best --Lenticel (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

We demand more asbestos![edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (utc) 01:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a particularly notable joke. If any sort of memorable line needs a redirect, you'd need at least a dozen redirects per episode. Thegreatluigi (talk) 13:27, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Godsword[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (utc) 01:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overly generic, not mentioned in article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merits of a dab?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (utc) 11:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disam if anyone can find examples of its use, If not Delete per GAMECRUFT. –Davey2010Talk 21:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as gaming trivia (Wikipedia isn't Runescape Wikia). Closest synonym that I got was God's word which is really pushing it in my opinion --Lenticel (talk) 01:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Runescape Power Leveling[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (utc) 01:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant WP:GAMEGUIDE, not a suitable redirect. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, old and harmless. GAMEGUIDE is a content guide, not a redirect guide. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 04:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The redirect promises content which Wikipedia cannot deliver: the target has no content about power leveling, and WP:GAMEGUIDE explains why not. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this since the content in the target section discusses skill leveling, which seems to be what this is referring to.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (utc) 11:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom - GAMECRUFT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davey2010 (talkcontribs) 21:53, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete as confusing since the main article doesn't discuss power levelling. Also seems to be gamecrufty. --Lenticel (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super combo[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 8#Super combo

Bad hat harry[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As Bad Hat Harry has been created, this can be deleted. In general, I feel it's likely better to just move without a redirect to preserve history, but sobeit. ~ Amory (utc) 01:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – no incoming links, simple miscapitalization. No similar redirect at the correct, more likely form Bad Hat Harry (note: the latter page was created on 3 April 2018). —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC) (edited 14:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Tooltip[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 8#Template:Tooltip

Fighting for Freedom[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Fighting for Freedom (film). (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A non-notable title from a fringe author. No incoming links. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Regardless of capitalization, the term should not be associated with this author alone – that would imply POV about the subject. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete as per above - Should not be associated with any BLP. –Davey2010Talk 21:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of World Heritage Sites in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. R3-able ~ Amory (utc) 01:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect would imply, to me, that its creator believes that Gough and Inaccessible Islands are the only World Heritage Sites in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha. Firstly, I'm not certain if that is the case. Secondly, there is an active application to add the Islands of Saint Helena as a world heritage site (http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5675/), which would give this territory two such sites. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:48, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.