Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 June 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 9[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 9, 2015.

Melbourne City Wrestling[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 June 16#Melbourne City Wrestling

Paul Nungesser[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW delete per WP:BLP1E / WP:BLPCRIME. --slakrtalk / 04:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted immediately as it is a BLP violation. Currently our article at Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight) does not include the accused's name. Sammy1339 (talk) 03:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete- I edited it so it will no longer work prior to deletion [1]. I agree this should be deleted as a BLP violation. Recently, text regarding a performance art video which appears to be a recreation of an alleged rape he's accused of committing has been added to the article. As someone never charged or convicted of rape, his name should not redirect to that article. --BoboMeowCat (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately his "full defense", which is the qualifier to add his name contains several BLP violations: such as texts released out of context, allegedly from Sulkowicz, regarding prior alleged sexual assault and prior alleged sexually transmitted disease. His defense also includes this text sent the year prior to the alleged assault which reads "fuck me in the butt", which the accused presents as an invitation to the activity and which Sulkowicz said was an expression Freshman year to mean "I'm so annoyed."
Additionally, since that BLPN discussion, with the very qualified consensus, new text has been added to the article regarding a performance art video which appears to be a rape reenactment of the alleged rape he was accused of. Talk page consensus was we would keep his name out of the article now, to avoid hits on his name being linked to a rape reenactment video.[2] --BoboMeowCat (talk) 14:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete on the balance of WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPCRIME. Currently, his name is not mentioned at the article due to not meeting reasonable conditions arrived at by a thorough consensus, so in the simplest argument it's a nonsense redirect. However (and this is a big problem) the article repeatedly refers to "the accused" and then links to references which very clearly state that "the accused" is him, which if it were to be considered libel, is contributory libel on Wikipedia's part. We might as well put his name in the article, then. But we haven't, so this redirect should go away. Ivanvector (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete immediately as a BLP violation per BLPCRIME and BLPNPF. --DHeyward (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete immediately per BLPN. Minor4th 19:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Talk:CFLZ-FM[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close, issue resolved. --BDD (talk) 14:35, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CFLZ-FM and CJED-FM are separate articles, yet for some reason Talk:CFLZ-FM is being redirected to the other's talk page. Not sure why this is necessary and personally feel the redirect is not appropriate per WP:POFRED and No. 5 of WP:R#DELETE, but would like clarification. Marchjuly (talk) 02:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment why didn't you just boldly bypass the redirect and implement the project banners? -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 04:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I never deleted or undid a redirect before so I was unfamiliar as to how to do it. Moreover, the redirect was made in 2012 so I wasn't sure if there was a specific reason for it. - Marchjuly (talk) 06:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the contents of the talk page, talk:CJED-FM only apply to the article CFLZ-FM, so the talk page needs to be returned to the talk:CFLZ-FM location (the project banner apply to both locations, but in both cases, it is wrong, since the two articles are at least start-class) -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 04:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's what is meant by project banner. (I call them "WikiProject tags", but that may be my own invention.) --BDD (talk) 19:35, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the clarification BDD. Is there any procedural thing/clean up I need to do after I edit the redirect page? Do I just simply remove the {{rfd}}? - Marchjuly (talk) 00:24, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can just overwrrite it with the banners for that page. --BDD (talk) 13:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Please fix it if I messed things up. Thanks again. - Marchjuly (talk) 14:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. --BDD (talk) 14:35, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.