Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 September 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 29, 2014.

Wikipedia:THATSBOGUSSOWECANIGNOREPOLICY[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Just Chilling (talk) 21:50, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page created simply to bluelink one link mentioned in a discussion at random. Nobody would ever come here or link to here, because the redirect is longer than the target. KonveyorBelt 21:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hey I got a "Thank" for creating that! Of course if you want to use the page for something else, go ahead! All the best: Rich Farmbrough00:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC).
  • Delete I guess the editors already had their fun with this. --Lenticel (talk) 02:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete now we have Rich Farmbrough's permission. Si Trew (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Article needed[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Just Chilling (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think this was created by a misunderstanding. By "page" we mean the page of a book not a wiki page. Magioladitis (talk) 17:46, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. A redlink indicates a needed article, and does not need a cleanup superscripted note - 65.94.171.225 (talk) 04:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as above. Si Trew (talk) 13:42, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.