Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 June 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 1[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 1, 2014.

Joke redirects created by User:Adanhi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as vandalism (joke creation). — Scott • talk 08:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joke redirects. Created by Adanhi (talk · contribs · count · logs). jonkerz ♠talk 22:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the last one per nom (the top two have already been redlinked).--Lenticel (talk) 02:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heil Mao[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 00:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what's the point of this. No incoming links. jonkerz ♠talk 22:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No evidence that Heil Mao refers to anything worth an encyclopedia article. Ego White Tray (talk) 03:23, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete My Google search didn't provide any useful info about this phrase's connection to Stalin.--Lenticel (talk) 02:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Mao Tse-tung unless a good reason for the current target emerges. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC).
  • Delete as nonsense. Probably should have been deleted per WP:CSD#G1, but now it does not make any difference. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 19:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Splooge Drenched Blowjob Queen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Broadway Bro Down and keep, respectively. --BDD (talk) 00:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note:Two similar entries combined. Ego White Tray (talk) 03:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Completely unlikely redirect. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep both. It's a plausible search term, IMO, from someone watching Broadway Bro Down and wondering what the musical being referenced is. It would maybe make more sense to retarget it to Broadway Bro Down to make the reference explicit. Mogism (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep (and retarget one) per Mogsim. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC).
Ok, I withdraw the proposal but both should redirect to Broadway Bro Down. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Some old stub tag redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 00:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - all of these are either completely orphaned or (in the case of Euro- and US-) only 1 transclusion; these all match an old stub tag name pattern, no longer in use since 2006 (per Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/September/11. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nomination. No benefit to retaining and safe to remove. — Scott • talk 15:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. Looks like "trade" is the name of the game ... err, stubs. Calling it anything else, such as "labor", could cause confusion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:49, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Both Template:UK-labor-org-stub (one transclusion) and Template:UK-labour-org-stub (unused) exist. "Labour" had the RFD but "Labor" was listed here; I assume both are nominated and have added the RFD to the "labor" redirect. There's one more, Template:SouthAfrica-labor-org-stub, but that still has several uses, most in 2006 or 2007 before the template was renamed but also three recently (2 May) on new pages created by the same user; should that also be replaced? Peter James (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Orphan and delete All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_June_1&oldid=1037875785"