Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 August 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 19[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 19, 2014.

Trolly Line[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Tram. --BDD (talk) 13:57, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unlikely and misspelled redirect - the redirect was created (it appears) only because an editor was confused about the technical limitations of article names. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bang Bang (telenovela)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:58, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect should be deleted cause it's inappropriate to redirect a TV show to one of the actors. At last there's no further information about the telenovela provided in Fernanda Lima. So a red link would be the better choice and an appropriate solution in this case. 84.141.7.214 (talk) 16:36, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Intrasomatic model[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete: This was deleted in February 2013 but was created as a redirect to a passage which does not mention this obscure and non-notable notion. Mangoe (talk) 15:37, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Capital of Macau[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:04, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no official capital of Macau. - TheChampionMan1234 03:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your compelling evidence. It's not only a pointless but a fallacious redirect which has to be deleted. --84.141.7.214 (talk) 17:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.--Lenticel (talk) 00:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment there is the legislature Macau Legislative Assembly Building -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:07, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Of course but what has that got to do with the subject? For example: there are legislative buildings in Hong Kong too - but (assuming that capital ≠ capitol) there are no capitals - either of Hong Kong or of Macao. --84.141.7.42 (talk) 10:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • "o" and "a" is a minor difference, where redirects are frequently created. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 03:06, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Seúl[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No affinity for Spanish. - TheChampionMan1234 03:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Visitor interpretive center[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Interpretation centre. --BDD (talk) 14:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are many many places called "visitor interpretive center" - this is essentially a generic name redirecting to a specific place Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for your comment. Though I did not find any others with this exact name, this is a reasonable concern. Perhaps a stronger alternative would be a DAB page? Or possibly a List of visitor interpretive centers. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 02:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • A list might be appropriate, but my concern with either that or a disambiguation is that it essentially becomes a list of parks. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 14:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Whether or not we are agreed that the existing target (Adirondack Park Agency visitor interpretive centers) is subpar. --84.141.7.42 (talk) 09:59, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is not reason to delete this redirect, none at all. It doesn't matter if we have very similar redirects already, this one would still be useful if directed to the right target. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mau̯ː˧˥ tsɤ˧˥.tʊŋ˥[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term. - TheChampionMan1234 00:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

+1: useless redirect: not even a moji baker would rummage an encyclopedia for that "character" sequence. --84.141.7.214 (talk) 16:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: It is perfectly valid IPA. We don’t keep redirects from pronunciations, so delete it anyway. Just stop calling characters you don’t recognize mojibake. Gorobay (talk) 19:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I had no idea what it is, but I knew it certainly wasn't mojibake. - TheChampionMan1234 01:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment also, its not IPA, because at the target it says that the IPA is "(/ˈmaʊ zəˈdʊŋ," - TheChampionMan1234 03:24, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The form in the article is a broad transcription, and this one is narrow. They are both IPA. Gorobay (talk) 22:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_August_19&oldid=1039434920"