Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 April 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 6, 2014.

Xylocopa appendiculata[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 April 16#Xylocopa appendiculata

Roman imperial coinage[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Roman currency. --BDD (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a xwiki soft redirect. This article will eventually be created. GZWDer (talk) 13:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reinstate lower case redirect to Roman currency. Only a capitalised Roman Imperial Currency page should be about the catalogue. – Fayenatic London 20:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Faynetic london. People are constantly digging up Roman coins in England and this is Treasure trove. I imagine they have more in other countries before the Romans made their way from, er, Rome, to the United Kingdom. By the way it is not true that all roads lead to Rome, I ended up in Naples by mistake. Si Trew (talk) 20:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Fayenatic london. John Vandenberg (chat) 22:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Neurothemis intermedia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a xwiki soft redirect. This article will eventually be created. GZWDer (talk) 13:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Agree with nominator GZWDer. We can't have redirects going all over the bloody place, and especially escaping outside of EN:WP (this one ends up [here at species.wikimedia.org] which unless I am mistaken is not part of the English Wikipedia. Valuable maybe, but not part of the English Wikipedia.) Now, it might be worth asking wikimedia.org if it could be included in the English Wikipedia, but since it isn't, delete it for now: we have had loads of discussions lately on cross-namespace redirects (WP:CNR) and quite rightly now another editor brings them here that actually link to sites outside EN:WP, which I don't know how to put it politely but is just wrong. Si Trew (talk) 21:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; we have Neurothemis as a good search result. John Vandenberg (chat) 12:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mariées mais pas trop[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural close. The redirect has been converted into an article. If there are issues with the new article, please consider nominating it on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a xwiki soft redirect. This article will eventually be created. GZWDer (talk) 13:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I concur, no need per reasons given by GZWDer
Enquire (talk) 14:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I'm inexperienced at RfD, but this strikes me as useful. There are incoming links. I expect that many people who have clicked on incoming links will have enough knowledge of French to learn something from the French page. Of course, we could probably create a stub as quickly as talk about it; I'm willing. – Fayenatic London 20:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. We are all inexperienced, so don't worry about that. But this is a redirect across an Interwiki to the French article of the same name, which is a stub about a film of the entitled, produced between the French and the Belgians. That is just odd. It's up to FR:WP what to do about the stub, but the redirect is absurd. Si Trew (talk) 20:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • I would create and translate the article on EN:WP but since it is just a list of performers and actors etc. I don't see there is any use in it being at EN:WP. If others think otherwise I am happy to translate it, there is not much to translate. The title means roughly "We are married, but not much". I've added a bit at WP:PNT referring back to this so that other translators can stick their oar in. Si Trew (talk) 20:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close. WP:NOTBURO. We don't do interwiki redirects, because if it's worthy an article, a red link ultimately serves the reader better by attracting someone to write one. Given that reasoning, I've turned it into an article. Anyone is of course free to AfD it, but in the meantime this discussion should be closed and then it can be linked to the French and Russian articles via WikiData. Yngvadottir (talk) 12:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ignacy Gryczyński[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a xwiki soft redirect. This article will eventually be created. GZWDer (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This is a redirect to the Polish Wikipedia. Since when did we start doing Interwiki redirects? Si Trew (talk) 21:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. John Vandenberg (chat) 09:34, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brachydiplax chalybea[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 April 16#Brachydiplax chalybea

24 (TV channel)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a xwiki soft redirect. This article will eventually be created. GZWDer (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Interwiki redirect to Ukranian WP. When did we start to get Interwiki redirects? That is what Interwiki links are for. Per nom, delete to encourage creation, per WP:REDLINK. Si Trew (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Interwiki links to Wiktionary can make sense, and it may make sense to soft redirect pages in the Wikipedia: namespace to Meta (and elsewhere?), but otherwise, I'm not sure when they're ever be useful. WilyD 09:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - to encourage creation. WilyD 09:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and WilyD, even wrt wiktionary redirects in mainspace, which are essentially a placeholder to allow links from other articles to be blue. John Vandenberg (chat) 12:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_April_6&oldid=1050184473"