Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 February 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 13, 2013

Team Four Star[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 02:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No mention on target page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 09:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chomsky with dick jokes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 02:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete.The redirect page makes homonymous searching most confusing in the search engine. The wording is not even mentioned in the target page. 90.96.169.249 (talk) 17:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Barbara Stiegler[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 02:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page redirects to a highly disputable section in the article about her father. In herself does not match criteria and deserves neither section nor, a fortiori, redirect page. 90.96.169.249 (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

there seems nothing controversial in the present section on her. the books are documentable. That she may not meet the criteria for notability is why there is a redirect--if she did, it would be a full article. Or then again she might, one had been significant reviews. Perhaps the section should be expanded. DGG ( talk ) 20:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.