Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 June 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 12[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 12, 2012

Selyse Baratheon (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from the declined prod "Not a true disambiguation page, has never disambiguated two articles, unnecessary as a redirect. Selyse Baratheon already exists as a perfectly good and logical redirect." AIRcorn (talk) 04:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Old car[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Disambiguate, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous term. If jalopy has to have a hatnote saying "This refers to beat up old cars, not well kept antique cars", then the ambiguity is too much. A car can be "old" without being a jalopy. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate. In addition to Jalopy this could also mean Veteran car, Vintage car or Classic car. Thryduulf (talk) 15:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate for now This was an article one time that was userfied following an afd. I do want to work on making it a better article some day, but I haven't gotten around to that yet. Until then, a disamb is good enough. Hellno2 (talk) 20:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguated, expansion is welcome.--Lenticel (talk) 05:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

10th Supply and Transportation Battalion[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Thryduulf (talk) 17:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect should be deleted. The 10th Supply and Transportation Battalion is not the same unit as the 10th Transpostation Battalion. 10th S&T was redisignated as the 10th Forward Support Battalion when 10th DISCOM deactiviated and reflagged as 10th Sustainment Brigade. Ryan.opel (talk) 02:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Escuadrón 201 (film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete per WP:CSD#G7. Jenks24 (talk) 19:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the redirect. I introduced the existence of this World War II film to WP some years ago; the redir points to the Mexican squadron the film is about. (A friend's uncle was in the squadron; my friend told me about the film.) The redir implies an article and there isn't one, creating confusion. Varlaam (talk) 16:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.