Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 May 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 12[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 12, 2011

Implementation detail[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 18:40, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This term has much more general uses not specific just to how run-time itself is implemented. I would suggest retargeting to a more general article, but I don't know what article that would be. Thus, I counsel Delete. The term probably even merits its own article, but there is obviously none at present. Cybercobra (talk) 19:21, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Classical Libertarianism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 18:41, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. The term "classical libertarianism" has no standard meaning and is contextually defined as either left-wing or right-wing libertarianism. TFD (talk) 17:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is a term that is is in use but with no agreed definition, so there won't be an article for it any time soon, meaning a redirect to the main article is helpful to the 40-50 people a month who view this page. Additionally it is serving to discourage the recreation of a POV fork that was created here in 2004. Thryduulf (talk) 19:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It is reasonable to redirect to a more general / parent article in such a circumstance. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.