Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 July 31

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 31[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 31, 2011

Template:Vgrationale/doc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation subpage for redirected template, Documentation for the template concerned is automatically transcluded at the new location making this redirect pointless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Logo fur/doc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation subpage for redirected template, Documentation for the template concerned is already transcluded automatically at the new location making this redirect pointless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Historic fur/doc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation subpage for redirected template, Documentation for the template concerned is already transcluded at the new location, making this template pointless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Film poster fur/doc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation subpage for redirected template, Documentation for the template concerned is already transcluded at the new location, making this redirect pointless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Film cover fur/doc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation subpage for redirected template. Documentation for the template concerned is already automatically transcluded at the new location, making this redirect pointless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:27, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Book cover fur/sandbox[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox page for redirected template, New changes should be made in the renamed sandbox, making this redirect pointless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Book cover fur/doc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation subpage of redirected template. Documentation for template concerned is already transcluded automatically (at the new name), making this redirect pointless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:25, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Album cover fur/testcases[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect for template testcases, Testcases should be developed at the new location, making this re-direct pointless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:23, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Album cover fur/sandbox[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to sandbox. Ideally all new changes should be in the new location making this redirect pointless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Album cover fur/doc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation subpage for redirected template. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Image fairuse rationale[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep by licensing reasons. Ruslik_Zero 14:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect in template namespace. Unused in filespace. Name seems to be misleading as to intended function. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mia Talerico[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep and refine the target. Ruslik_Zero 14:26, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AFD resulted in this redirect to the show she is in. Suggest instead that this article/redirect just be deleted and protected to prevent article creation. I would rather see a red link than a bio article that directs to an article with basically nothing about the person (other than a role) in it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong keep. The AfD was clear that there should not be a bio article yet, as she is only known for one role (that appears to be basically her anyway) and an updated look at IMDB shows that she has still only had the one role. However, she is apparently a massive search target with ~18k hits in June, ~17k hits in May (tens of hits/month is large for many redirects) so a redlink is exactly wrong for this situation. Thryduulf (talk) 11:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. If this redirect is kept at least change it to point to Good Luck Charlie#Mia Talerico, an anchor in the casting section of the page. That is the only place in the article where the actor is actually talked about. The current redirect is pretty useless for people who get to this page and don't see something immediately useful about the person being looked for. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, I meant to suggest refining the target to that but evidently forgot. Sorry. Thryduulf (talk) 21:23, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine target to Good Luck Charlie#Mia Talerico. When a person is potentially notable then deletion to encourage article creation is in order. However, an AfD has decided that she is not yet notable and that this should be a redirect. We should respect the AfD consensus. If, in the future, she becomes notable then an article can still be written on top of this redirect. Bridgeplayer (talk) 23:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kingfisher East Bengal Club[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 14:16, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect has only been viewed 6 times is last 30 days. Clearly not Common misspelling/other name. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 05:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Redirect is actually being used as pointed out to the nominator. Redirects are cheap and we shouldn't be removing things that improve a reader's ability to navigate Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 10:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Whpq - no reason to delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - we only delete redirects if they in some way cause problems. This is potentially useful and does no harm; ergo, keep. Bridgeplayer (talk) 23:41, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kingfisher East Bengal Football Club[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 14:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect has only been viewed twice is last 30 days. Clearly not Common misspelling/other name. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 05:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - The redirect is within policy as a more specific form of the club. It is in fact the official name of the club. The fact that it was used 2 times indicates that the redirect does serves its purpose. -- Whpq (talk) 10:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Whpq - no reason to delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - we only delete redirects if they in some way cause problems. This is potentially useful and does no harm; ergo, keep. Bridgeplayer (talk) 23:42, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

East Bengal (football club)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 14:13, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect has been only viewed 12 times in the last 30 days. Clearly not Common misspelling/other name for the club. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 05:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Redirect is actually being used as pointed out to the nominator. Redirects are cheap and we shouldn't be removing things that improve a reader's ability to navigate Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 10:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Whpq - no reason to delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - we only delete redirects if they in some way cause problems. This is potentially useful and does no harm; ergo, keep. Bridgeplayer (talk) 23:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Taxonomy/Aggregations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The template was originally for a nonexistant genus Aggregations in the family Caryophylliidae, but it should have been the genus Lophelia, so it was moved. Therefore, this is a misleading redirect. TimBentley (talk) 00:22, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it needs to be deleted; the question is whether it makes sense to include a link to the target in the deletion summary, though. If the genus never existed and is unlikely to ever be referenced again accidentally, it should be simply deleted. If it's actually an invalid synonym, it needs to have the target link included in the deletion summary, but it doesn't sound like that's the case here. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 03:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2011_July_31&oldid=1039424280"