Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 July 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 16, 2011

The King (Burgle King)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:38, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an odd typo, not the most plausible of search terms. A google search reveals that Burgle King refers to a different entity entirely, however it is not notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. The only uses of this term are as a direct result of this typo. Thoughts on deletion? Taelus (talk) 18:56, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • As a note, I refined the target before listing this at RfD from the main burger king article to the specific article about the mascot. I don't believe this changes my concerns though. --Taelus (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Swejsantokotha wiki page[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Peridon per G8 and R3. Thryduulf (talk) 12:05, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For obvious reasons. Test page, really. Drmies (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as redirect to redlink. Peridon (talk) 21:35, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Allmovie[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was reverted to state prior to undiscussed redirect without merge. Allrovi as an article is now outside the scope of RfD; no prejudice to a nomination of the Allmoive redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 12:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allrovi (formerly Allmovie) has little to do with Allmusic, apart from their similar format and the same owner. In terms of content, the two sites are completely different. The Allmusic article, which Allmovie redirects to, makes no mention of Allrovi. I therefore propose the deletion of these two redirects. —Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous user had redirected Allrovi to Allmusic, with no merge and no explanation. I've undone it, and reverted the changes to the Allmovie redirect. Peter E. James (talk) 13:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Go to http://allmovie.com - it redirects to Allrovi. WTF (talk) 02:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Namassej(Namasudra)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant redirect. This Indian community/caste redirect appears to serve no useful function. It merely reverses the title of the target article and omits a space between the two different names for the group. There are in fact many other spellings, as is common with these castes (transliteration issues etc). As a search term it serves no purpose, and there is already another redirect page for the parenthesised term, viz. Namassej. It has had a complicated history, I admit!Sitush (talk) 03:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Basically, this is, if not an implausible typo, then at least an implausible misnomer. No one would type this in as a search term like this, and since Namassej already exists as a redirect, this longer one is redundant. Drmies (talk) 03:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Pinakes (tables[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Old redirect for typo and now a double redirect after move. Eeekster (talk) 03:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agree. I see no need for this. Drmies (talk) 03:35, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I feel it should be Pinakes (tables), not Pinakes (Callimachus). References refer to it as "called the Pinakes or Tables" and do not associate the name directly to Callimachus as in Pinakes (Callimachus). According to this reference ' ...Callimachus of Cyrene was perhaps Alexandria's most famous librarian, creating for the first time a subject catalog in 120,000 scrolls of the Library's holdings, called the Pinakes or Tables.--Doug Coldwell talk 11:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2011_July_16&oldid=1138577760"