Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 February 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 11[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 11, 2011

Wheel of Fortune (Home Game)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) →GƒoleyFour← 02:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term. Content of home game's article previously deleted at Wheel of Fortune (board game). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep for multiple reasons. First, "unlikely search term" is not a sufficient reason for deletion since redirects do far more than merely support the search engine. In this case, the redirect is plausibly preempting the re-creation of non-notable content. More than that, however, I have no idea how the AfD for the (board game) version was closed as "delete". I read that as at best "no consensus" (though almost certainly not "keep-as-is"). The redirect points any prospective readers to the correct and more general concept - one of the preferred uses for a redirect. Rossami (talk) 00:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Millennium City[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Move the dab page to Millennium City (with hist merge). Ruslik_Zero 15:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was previously an inappropriately detailed article on a fictional place. I've redirected it to the disambig page for now, but I think it should perhaps redirect to the Hong Kong neighborhood. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • very weak oppose. I've added three more entries to the dab page. Looking at the results of a google.co.uk search for "Millennium City" -wikipedia there does not appear to be a single primary usage, with the shopping centre in Vienna possibly being the most prominent - not enough through for a primary topic status, especially as our article (Millennium Tower (Vienna)) is focused on the most significant building in the complex rather than the complex itself. My oppose is "very weak" as the Hong Kong neighbourhood is the primary topic among those we have articles for, and so would not bad in prime position, but as I think the dab page should certainly get the prominency if an article about the complex in Vienna is written (or the article about the tower broadened), then it's probably best to have it there anyway. The city in Texas is seemingly not referred to by it's nickname that often, the city in India is, but not enough to be the primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 12:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.