Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 20[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 20, 2010

Nobel politics prize[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξxplicit 00:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No such name for the Nobel Peace Prize. It is also a POV. Quest for Truth (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - no such Nobel prize; plainly created to make a point. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete—while POV is not necessarily a reason to delete a redirect, this term is not common usage and is not an actual Nobel Prize. –Grondemar 06:10, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Welcome Visitors[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. — ξxplicit 00:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Useless, implausible typos for redirects; the first is a cross-namespace redirect, the last two are unlikely search terms, not every single strand of 0s and 1s, dashes and dots have to be redirected to any of the two target articles. An endless string of such redirects could follow: 01000010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 11111001, -- --- .-. ... - for example. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 00:23, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom. Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:26, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all—none of these redirects are useful. –Grondemar 06:09, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep "-- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. ." as that is morse code written in morse code, and thus is a weakly plausible redirect. 76.66.194.212 (talk) 07:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The binary strand reads "Binary" in ASCII (or ANSI). Doesn't make it a plausible redirect, though. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment ASCII isn't a binary numeral system... (and why 8-bit coding, since ASCII is 7-bits... unlike EBCDIC); I agree the binary coded redirect is implausible. 76.66.194.212 (talk) 07:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_November_20&oldid=1074238983"